What is ontology . Epistemology. Methodology. Discursivism

Discursivism: the determination of the relationality of things through their logical analysis. By deduction, the contradiction in the thing itself is revealed, and this internal contradiction is realized through the inner workings of the thing (in other words, it is born in the process of human cognition). Thus the contradiction itself lies in man's a priori cognition. This is why philosophical reflection on the world ultimately comes down to a realization of oneself, which we call reflection.) That is, temporal, not in contradicting itself in a static, worldly way. But in order to arrive at the required realization, and at the same time to acknowledge, as necessary, the inevitability of contradiction in reflection, a reconciliation of positive and negative is sought in opposition.

Methodology:Through methodology we seek a universal way of knowing things. The conclusions drawn from this reflection are principled, manipulable, convergent ideas.

Epistemology:This is distinguished from methodology in that it is a reflection that is a priori, not manipulable. Thus the purpose of epistemology itself is to approach the reality of knowing, not to prescribe ways of knowing. Such an approach to knowing itself by knowing itself has self-contradictory implications, just as you cannot see your own eyes in the absence of a mirror, because you are looking with your own eyes. So this kind of thinking ends up going into a priori psychology, where the conclusions drawn are conceptual and cannot be discovered from the physical world, because the constituents that determine the conclusions are all in play before experience comes into play. If there is to be an intuitive understanding of it then it is this: recognize how you are recognizing.

Ontology:the nature of things. It is not easy to get a clear idea about this area. Because each philosophy has its own unique interpretation of the understanding of the essence, it can even be said that the various philosophical schools of thought are divided on the definition of ontology. Ancient philosophers have always tried to clarify the nature of things and the world, but ultimately found that none of them had a ****common opinion on the nature of the essence. Metaphysical questions also tend to go around in circles in this place. Questions such as is the world one or many?

While separating these areas, they are interdependent and interacting with each other in the form of fits and starts. Often there are organic transitions to be made between them. Such as our discovery of contradiction through dialectical relationships, tracing back to our own epistemology through the generative theory of this contradiction, and then setting out a new methodology through our own epistemological deficiencies, and through a methodology that enables the essence of existence to be opened up through the inner workings of things.