Debate: Will paper reading be replaced by electronic reading? Both positive and negative views are acceptable, please provide them!

Main line: convenient and resource-saving

Entry point: 1. Advantages of electronic reading.

Such as: 1. Can meet the needs of the fast-paced lifestyle in today's society; 2. Linking with environmental protection can reduce the damage to forests and reduce the waste of resources; 3. It is the trend of social development and the direction people pursue. etc

Two. Insufficient reading of papers.

Such as: 1. There are many books to read, which is inconvenient to carry; 2. Preservation needs a lot of space; In order to make paper, a lot of forests must be cut down. etc

Opposite party: it will not be replaced.

Main line: it is still within the economic acceptable range of most people in today's society.

Entry point: 1. Advantages of paper reading.

For example, it is still the first choice for archiving in schools and enterprises. It is not easy to lose data. Wait, you're thinking about this yourself.

Two. The deficiency of electronic reading.

Although it is the trend of social development, it can't meet everyone's needs until it is completely perfect. Wait,

This advantage is not easy to think of. Anyway, as long as you demonstrate according to your own main line, there is no problem if you don't deviate, mainly because the angle is novel ~

I hope it helps you.