How to distinguish between today's heroes and ancient heroes

Your knowledge of Cao Cao is mostly from the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and even if it is from the Three Kingdoms periodicals, how much truth is there in it? So I think your evaluation of Cao Cao is too popular and lacks your own point of view, and remember to think independently on your own, don't be like everyone else, and if people say that Cao Cao is a hero and you say that he is too, then it really doesn't make much sense.

Whether it is ancient or modern, the hero first of all did something beneficial to the people, and secondly, he is very famous. These are the two basic points of a hero, and you can't have one without the other.

Cao Cao is not too much of a traitor, he killed the people of Xuzhou to calm his heart, stole the imperial tomb, destroyed cultural relics, and so on. A general's success is ten thousand bones withered, such a hero to the people in the end is good or bad?

Heroes do not necessarily have to be military and political fields, social progress, technological progress, cultural progress, and so on.

In summary, the criterion of a hero is whether he can bring happiness to the people.

The standard for heroes is to be able to bring happiness to the people.