Why is family property divided in villages only for sons and not for daughters

Traditional villages focus on clans and housing. Under the law, children are entitled to the inheritance rights of the elderly, but many people living in rural areas may find it problematic that when the elderly divide up family property, everything is left to their sons and nothing to their daughters. More enlightened families may prepare dowries for their daughters when they marry, and foolish families may even claim dowries for their sons when their daughters marry. However, in rural areas, it has become common knowledge that family property is distributed only to sons and not to daughters. Why is this so? Why is family property reserved for sons only in rural areas? Next, old farmers reveal the truth, some of which we cannot ignore.

First, raising children to prevent old age

There is an old saying in the countryside that "raising children to prevent old age" means that when you are old, your son is raising you, and when you are sick, your son is taking care of you. My daughter does her best to be filial to her parents by going shopping on vacation. After all, it is my son who accompanies me. Therefore, when the family property is divided, the daughter has no share.

Second, patriarchal thinking

There are three reasons for unfilial behavior, and the biggest one is the lack of offspring. Although there are some in the cities, it is more serious in the rural areas. It was mainly ex-farmers, who had to cultivate the land on their own. When their sons grew up, they could take up farming and create more wealth for their families. However, after her daughter grew up after working hard, she had to marry someone else's house and raise children for them. As a result, people used to give birth to daughters who were called "money losers" and "married daughters, water splashers", which is a true reflection of how the former parents viewed their daughters.

Thirdly, parents are prejudiced.

While it is said that reform and opening up has been going on for so many years, most regions still consider sons to be more important than daughters, and daughters, after all, belong to someone else's family, so it is unlikely that they will share the family property with their daughters. However, people are biased and one cannot say that favoring sons over daughters is feudalism. Even when a family is full of sons, some people still prefer their youngest son. It is not uncommon for everything to be left to the youngest son.

Fourth, the rich and the poor do not flow into the outside world.

This is what many people think. Leaving your family property to your son remains his family's property. Leaving your family property to your daughter is the property of someone else's family. If your daughter marries someone else's house, the household will be moved out. In addition, the son-in-law is not related to himself by blood.

In short, of course, I am talking about some situations, not all. In fact, some of them are much better than what I have said. Many families not only buy houses for their sons, but they also take a share for their daughters depending on the family situation. In short, no matter what, as children, we must remember that "filial piety is the first of all virtues". Without our parents, there would be no us. It is the responsibility of every child to make their parents happy in their old age!