Which do you think is better, "seeing words like faces" or "readers"? Why?

First of all, both programs are great! I prefer readers! The two programs, The Scholar and Taking Words as Face, have chosen a relatively small but culturally tasteful theme. Although stars were invited to join us, they didn't shine, and they paid attention to cultural taste but didn't show off their knowledge.

Readers can dare to return to the simplest and richest world in the noisy times, so that everyone can experience the beautiful experience brought by quiet, solemn and meaningful emotions again, and it is possible to know themselves and the world again in the shock of the mind.

Taking words as face is the product of a similar project in Britain. From the choice of content and form, it is relatively small, so small that it is easy to be marginalized or even ignored. Extend your tentacles to the seemingly eccentric field of letter reading. There are too many uncertainties in the future program style and viewing situation, and you need to take risks. Producers and production teams resolutely set foot on such projects, which shows their courage and responsibility.

Compared with reading the book, seeing words like faces can be called "plain faces", which is a typical low-cost production. Although many stars were invited to help out, it looked more like a friendship performance. Compared with the big studio in Dong Qing, the scene design with words and faces is more like a salon with similar interests. In the reading session, it can be said that it is crisp and neat, and it is not sloppy at all. After the host and guests briefly explained the background in the second game, the readers went directly to the stage to read.

Telling other people's stories in The Reader reproduces the author's feelings and thoughts at that time and leads the audience into another world. I think this is more attractive to me!