Are there any answering skills or templates for subjective questions in history?

Different types of questions have different answers, such as

1. cause (background) category: subjective-objective, domestic-international, inevitable-possible, political-economic-cultural-social life-rights.

Foreign relations-ethnic relations, etc.

2. Measures (content): politics-economy-culture-social life-foreign relations-ethnic relations-military-education, etc. (process

Class: fuse-starting point-turning point-result-evaluation. There have been few exams in recent years. )

3. Impact categories: analytical, positive-negative, direct-indirect-far-reaching, internal-external, etc.

4. Functional category: from near to far, from inside to outside, direct-indirect-far-reaching, etc.

5. Evaluation categories: analytical, positive-negative, progressive-restrictive, early-late, etc. If the score is high, you can test: historical facts.

+nature and characteristics+influence (negative and positive)+conclusion.

6. Change (trend) category: from ... to ..., more and more ... etc.

7. Experience (enlightenment) category: the basic principles and viewpoints, experiences or lessons reflected by the materials, the direction to be worked hard or the rectification measures (should be

What to do, what not to do) and so on.

8. Comparative category: similarities and differences; Comparative perspective: cause-content-nature-result-influence, etc.

9. Judging (selecting) viewpoints: judging (selecting) viewpoints-explaining reasons (demonstrating)-summarizing and sublimating, etc.

10. Comment category: generally, the modes of "what", "why" and "how" are adopted. "What is it" is summed up from the materials.

What is your opinion or what do you agree with? "Why", that is, what is your reason; Marking papers generally requires "multi-angle" argumentation.

There should be no less than three arguments, and sometimes Chinese and foreign comparisons are needed. "How", the analysis of the source of right or wrong views, can generally be from the times and classes.

The limitation of thinking or theoretical height.