What are the characteristics of the review process of traditional journals?

The review process of traditional journals usually includes the following characteristics:

1. Strict peer review system: After receiving the manuscript, traditional journals will generally send it to experts in related fields for peer review. These experts will evaluate the quality, innovation and scientificity of the manuscript and put forward suggestions for revision. This process aims to ensure that the published articles have high academic value and reliability.

2. Long time period: Because peer review requires experts to invest time and energy, the review process of traditional journals is usually time-consuming. The whole process may take weeks or even months, from submitting the manuscript to receiving comments from reviewers, and finally deciding whether to accept or reject it.

3. Confidentiality: In order to protect the author's intellectual property rights and avoid plagiarism, the review process of traditional journals usually requires reviewers to keep the manuscript confidential. Reviewers need to destroy or return all materials related to the manuscript after completing the review.

4. Two-way communication: In the process of reviewing the manuscript, the author can communicate with the reviewer in two ways to discuss and elaborate the review opinions. This process helps the author to better understand the opinions of the reviewers and revise the manuscript accordingly.

5. Transparency of decision-making: When making a final decision, traditional journals usually provide detailed review reports to the authors, explaining the opinions of reviewers and the decisions of the editorial department. This practice helps to improve the transparency and credibility of periodicals.

6. Traceability: In order to ensure the fairness and accuracy of the review process, traditional journals usually record and save the whole review process. This includes the reviewer's personal information, review comments, author's reply, etc. When necessary, these records can be queried and tracked to ensure the compliance of the review process.