Is there any difference between the traditional bow force range of the same pound compound bow?

If the range of the runner is relatively simple, excluding other variables, it is actually the initial speed, that is, kinetic energy, that is, the total work input of comparison, that is, how much energy you store on the bow wall during the opening of the bow, and then the energy is transferred from the bow wall to the arrow during the release of the arrow. In junior high school, work = force x distance. In our problem, the amount of interference is simplified, so the comparison is made under the same stretching distance and the same number of pounds, that is to say, the maximum force is the same, the distance (stretching distance) is the same, and the only difference is the stretching curve.

Refer to the approximate tension curve I drew: 1 is the tension curve of traditional bow. With the increase of the distance (X axis), the tension becomes larger and larger, and the envelope area of this triangle is the total input work. 2 is the general tension curve of compound bow, obviously the envelope area will be a little larger than that of traditional bow. However, if the eccentric wheel and other mechanisms are well designed, the tension curve envelope in 3 can be realized. Obviously, this area is the largest, much larger than the traditional bow, and the limit is twice that of the traditional bow. This only refers to the export kinetic energy. According to the theorem of kinetic energy, kinetic energy is proportional to the square of velocity, so the velocity of the ideal compound bow is at most 1.4 14 times that of the traditional bow. . . . . . . . Tired stool