Why is Deyun Society getting more and more popular when there is no successor to traditional crosstalk?

It is incorrect to say that traditional cross talk has no successor. The "fragrance" of traditional crosstalk has never been broken. Because of well-known reasons, traditional cross talk was banned for a long time. In that case, no one taught or learned. However, the fire was saved.

The Central Radio Rap Group compiled some traditional crosstalk into a book, which was later called the "four books" of internal communication. At that time, ordinary people, even insiders, were hard to get these four books. Degang Guo borrowed these treasures from Chang Baofeng, copied them at home, and then returned the books to Chang Baofeng. Chang Baofeng didn't give it all to Degang Guo at once, but also borrowed one. The complete works of China's traditional crosstalk can be bought everywhere, and the teaching and learning of traditional crosstalk is no longer limited. In addition to students from Deyun Society, students from Tianjin North Music School can also learn traditional crosstalk systematically.

However, it must be pointed out that it is important to inherit the tradition, but not to innovate is a dead end. The development of cross talk depends on innovation. It is almost impossible for traditional crosstalk to surpass its predecessors, but it is different to say something new. It is completely "unprecedented." If it's none other than Degang Guo. With his old job, Deyun Society has developed rapidly, but many of his new jobs were more than ten years ago. Without those new jokes and relying solely on traditional cross talk, he could not have such a position today.

Cross talk is a traditional art, so what is traditional cross talk? The so-called traditional cross talk has such an established rule that cross talk works produced and performed before liberation belong to traditional cross talk, and cross talk that reflects the new life of the new regime after liberation is new cross talk. Zhu Shaowen is regarded as the originator of cross talk. Died in 1904, a figure in Daoguang period. It's only 100 years. In other words, the history of crosstalk is not long, and the so-called traditional crosstalk is not too traditional.

Compared with Baliren, crosstalk is a folk art, which can't be compared with dramas that have been circulated for thousands of years. But his performance is simple, convenient and flexible, and what he said is also popular with everyone. Coupled with the main entertainment, it is true that the audience likes him.

However, it is completely normal for those so-called traditional cross talks to be eliminated. Many traditional cross talk jokes have lost their vitality because they have no background. For example, the "Selling Pictures", which imitates all kinds of street hawking, certainly won't be listened to by the young audience, and there is no joke.

There is also "selling tickets". There are basically no cinemas now. What tickets are available? Looking for a church meeting, a big bodyguard, an article meeting, praising the house, opening a porridge factory, discussing business, signing up, geographical map, Yellow Crane Tower, eight major undertakings, eight fan screens, three myopia, white and so on.

It is normal for these traditional cross talks to be successful and recognized by the audience based on the living environment at that time. However, with the rapid change of life, these old jokes have no support from the living environment, and no one says this is normal.

Many cross talks of Deyun Society are improved "traditional cross talks". In the process of creation, there are many modes of cross talk. It is true that the doctor said that cross talk has a routine. Many cross talk jokes of Deyun Society use the structure of traditional cross talk to tell the story of present life. Although the content of the joke is old, the cross talk structure remains unchanged, which is another inheritance of the traditional cross talk. It is definitely not good to cling to the remnants, but the best way is to inherit and carry forward. The development of literature, porcelain, painting and opera is the same, and they all need to continue to innovate on the original basis.

Deyun social fire is not without reason. There are many good traditions that can't adapt to the new environment, so it's normal to disappear. There are still few traditions that have disappeared in the past.

It is unscientific to separate Deyun Society from traditional crosstalk, because Deyun Society's crosstalk is also based on traditional crosstalk. It's not that there are no successors, but that we don't know, because there are still many people, but Deyun Society is too powerful and they are not very conspicuous. The success of Deyun Society is firstly the success of operation, secondly the success of creation and thirdly the success of performance. But a closer look at Deyun's recent works is indeed getting farther and farther away from our ancestors.

However, they are still based on their ancestors. Therefore, it is unfair to kick Deyun Society out of tradition, and it is disrespectful to kick tradition out of Deyun Society. As a public opinion, it is not good to have independent thinking and understanding, which will add fuel to the fire.