Will the old houses that are empty in the countryside be recycled?

With the continuous improvement of people's living standards, many rural residents yearn for urban life, so how to solve the house left in the countryside has become a problem. Others, although living too shabby, still occupy the land area. Therefore, how to solve the problem of old houses left over from rural areas has become a hot topic at present.

Now, there are two arguments. The first argument is to recycle these houses and reuse the land they occupy. The second argument is to preserve the old houses in rural areas, which is to protect the local material and cultural heritage.

First of all, I think empty old houses will be recycled, because when the occupied land resources are not used, it is a waste. We can cultivate these lands to provide food for people, and we can also plant trees on these lands to improve the water and soil, so in many ways, this is a matter with more advantages than disadvantages. Secondly, some old houses are really messy from the outside. Even if it is preserved, it can't stand the destruction of natural factors, and it's not worth wasting manpower and material resources.

On the other hand, however, we have to discuss whether these houses are really worth preserving. For example, some houses of ethnic minorities have their own cultural characteristics. If it is demolished, you may not see such cultural objects in the future, so you can only watch pictures and enjoy them online. For us, this is the loss of cultural relics and the decline of culture. Therefore, the government will definitely evaluate the reference value of some old houses before demolition. Therefore, first of all, whether this old house will be demolished depends on its cultural value.