Games distort the influence of historical figures.

The influence of distorting historical figures in games includes inducing primary school students to misunderstand historical figures.

For a simple example, in the glory of the king, Jing Ke is a female character; in the historical The King of Qin was stabbed by Jing Ke, Jing Ke was a male, and there were many pupils playing the glory of the king. Before coming into contact with such cultural knowledge, they will subconsciously think that Jing Ke is a woman and misunderstand historical figures. Later, it was because of being informed by CCTV that Jing Ke was changed to Ake.

The influence of games on the rehabilitation of historical figures;

Or the glory of the king, I just said is a bad influence, good influence is also active hero should be Su Lie Su Fangding. Prior to this, it was estimated that Su was the villain in the Sui, Tang and Xue series of TV dramas in most people's minds, but in the official history, it was the opposite. "Destroy the Three Kingdoms before and after, and capture their owners alive", with Li Jing, Hou.

As the ninth art, games should be as bold and innovative as other art forms. Not because he's a game. People who say that the game adaptation of history is a blasphemy against traditional culture often don't understand traditional culture themselves.

Our culture is constantly developing in innovation, and the times are the sieve for screening culture. Only valuable things can stay. If we cut off the road of innovation, our culture will always be a stagnant pool and will never develop.

Therefore, we should be more tolerant of games adapted from history and encourage innovation and re-creation. Only in this way can we produce more high-quality games and influence the world as a tool for cultural output.