Which is more practical, conventional or condensation?

Condensing wall-hung boiler is more practical than traditional wall-hung boiler.

1. According to the investigation of relevant institutions, condensing wall-hung boilers are more economical than traditional wall-hung boilers. In practical use, condensing boilers save 30-50% energy compared with traditional wall-hung boilers.

The 2.30-year-old master said that the condensing wall-hung boiler is better than the traditional wall-hung boiler, and it is more convenient to maintain and use. The traditional wall-hung boiler adopts small heat exchanger, which will greatly shorten its service life and is easy to be scrapped. Most condensing wall-hung boilers can be used for 25 years, while the service life of traditional wall-hung boilers is only 15 years at most.

Thirdly, many families are using the liquid circulation system, and the water supply temperature of the liquid circulation system is relatively low, generally around 40℃ ~ 50℃, so the liquid circulation system requires the wall-hung boiler to be combined with its temperature. Compared with the traditional wall-hung boiler, the condensing wall-hung boiler can be more perfectly combined with the circulation system.

To sum up, the condensing wall-hung boiler is more practical, more cost-effective and more popular than the traditional wall-hung boiler. In many developed countries in the west, condensing wall-hung boilers are almost standard for every household.