What's the difference between crosstalk and traditional crosstalk?

I feel that cross talk is changing. I stand on the street and listen to ordinary people. That paragraph is the result of several generations of polishing, and it is still changing. I don't think there is a difference between traditional and modern cross talk, because the art of cross talk has not been interrupted and broken for a long time. If we really want to define traditional cross talk, I don't think we can judge it from the content, because the current cross talk (if anyone listens) will eventually become traditional cross talk. Therefore, to define traditional cross talk, we should return to the essence of cross talk, that is, street language art, and making people laugh is the core feature. I think as long as it can stand the test of the market, anything you say casually is called traditional cross talk, because it is for the most common and vulgar ordinary people and goes deep into the masses. Therefore, the real traditional cross talk is neither good nor bad, regardless of the essence and dross, because only the audience and only the audience are the judges of the essence and dross. To put it simply, traditional crosstalk is to make the crosstalk change with the audience's taste, while other crosstalk is to make the audience change with the crosstalk taste.