There is a pluralistic, diverse and changeable situation in the ideological field today. What is the specific performance and development trend of civil servants?

At present, the ideological field of civil servants is diverse, diverse and changeable.

With the deepening of reform and opening up and the rapid development of China's social economy, while the relationship between economic and social interests has changed, the ideological field has also shown a pluralistic, diverse and changeable trend, showing many new characteristics. As the maker and executor of social policies and systems and the exerciser of state power, the ideology of civil servants is not only a concentrated reflection of social ideology, but also has an important influence on the ideology of real society. Through the investigation, analysis and research of some civil servants, we find that the main characteristics and trends of the pluralistic, diverse and changeable ideological field of civil servants at present are:

1. There is a mainstream in the ideological field, stability in the changeable, and ideological understanding is becoming more and more rational. In his ideological structure, China's traditional thought, China's Marxism and modern western thought are the most influential.

Under the increasingly open and changing social conditions, many ideas meet and influence, and the attitude of civil servants is positive and cautious. The mainstream is diversity, leading in diversity and stabilizing in diversity. The process of his ideological transformation is to break through the original "one" and seek "many", but the potential appeal is to achieve a higher level of "one" through "many".

The mainstream view among civil servants is that "monism and pluralism coexist best", and 69.0% of the respondents hold this view. 8 1.0% people think that "our country should have unified ideals and beliefs". 65. 1% people think that "highly consistent ideological leadership and diverse ideological cultures promote harmony and common development in conflicts", and 72.7% people think that ideological diversity can promote people's active thinking, adapt to the development of diversified economic entities, mobilize various interests and connect with the world. In his ideological structure, China's traditional thought, China's Marxism and western ideology and culture are the most influential. 34.4% people think that they can "choose the theory of democratic socialism to guide China's practice", and 3 1.2% people think that they can "choose neo-Confucianism to guide China's practice". When answering the question of which thought has the greatest influence on people's thoughts in real life, 56.7% people choose traditional Confucianism, 49.5% people choose Marxism, 48.5% people choose utilitarianism, and 20.6% people choose Christianity, Buddhism and other religions.

The basic political beliefs and attitudes of civil servants are relatively stable. 80.6% people think that "the development stage of today's society is the primary stage of socialism" and can correctly understand and support the connotations of "people-oriented" and "social justice". However, the desire of civil servants to change the mainstream ideology is strong, and its purpose is to enhance the vitality of the mainstream ideology. 7 1.0% people think that "the current mainstream ideology should be adjusted and a new explanation should be made".

Non-ideological trend of thought, as a kind of political trend of thought, began in the early 20th century and flooded in the mid-late 1950s and 1980s. It is a reflection on socialist theory and practice, aiming at the limitations of ideology itself, aiming at transcending Marxist political ideas, and has obvious class nature, culture and times. In today's China, its influence comes from two aspects: first, in the process of globalization, western countries' biased propaganda and interference in Marxism and socialist system; Second, the ideological confusion caused by the Marxist theory of proletarian political parties and socialist countries (mainly democratic socialist political parties and Soviet countries) divorced from the practice of the times, coupled with some problems existing in China's reform and opening up, the influence of non-ideological ideas on civil servants is more obvious. A considerable number of people tend to diversify the value orientation of the system and dilute the nature of the system. On how to look at the relationship between socialist core values and capitalist core values, 66.4% people think they can learn from each other. It shows that these people's ability and attitude to analyze problems have become very rational in the pluralistic and changeable era.

2. The pursuit of beliefs and values shows a trend of "more" and "change", but it tries to unify into the mainstream values of society and gain social recognition.

Beliefs and values triggered by changes in social and economic structure have changed from "one" to "many". The survey shows that the crisis of belief and the pursuit of diversity are the important features in the ideological field and life value field of civil servants in China today. 44.0% of the civil servants surveyed believe that the main problem of people's ideals and beliefs is the confusion of values, and 43.0% believe that "people nowadays are too utilitarian and pay too much attention to practicality, regardless of ideals and beliefs". Regarding the attitude towards religion, although 5 1.0% of the civil servants interviewed explicitly said that they did not believe in religion, 20.0% answered "I don't know", 19.0% said "I doubt" and 10.0% said "I believe" in religion. Consider their sense of identity when filling out the form. There may be more people with religious beliefs and potential beliefs. It shows that utilitarianism and religion have an increasing influence on civil servants.

However, a variety of outlook on life is not without direction, which is reflected in the fact that 95.0% people think that "Lei Feng spirit has eternal value", 54.0% people choose to be an official with the purpose of "doing good things for the people" and 365,438+0% people choose to be an official with the purpose of "becoming famous and starting a family", reflecting their realistic desire to pursue interests and try to unify the mainstream value of the party with their own value. It shows that the ideological status and spiritual realm of contemporary civil servants are still relatively high on the whole, and it is the mainstream to choose initiative and closely link personal struggle with the interests of the party and the state.

3. Generally speaking, the reform and opening up is positively evaluated, and some are negatively evaluated. Adhere to fairness and give priority to protecting the ecological environment in the direction of reform and development.

As people in the system, civil servants generally have a high evaluation of reform and opening up, high satisfaction with their own lives and high expectations for the future. 77.0% of the civil servants think that China's reform and opening-up policy is generally successful. 82.0% people are satisfied with life. 85.0% people think that the wealth of the rich after the reform and opening up is "partly justified and partly unfair". Regarding the widening income gap among different social groups, 68.0% people think it is "unreasonable but acceptable, and will become fair and reasonable with the deepening of reform".

The overall evaluation of local and unit civil servants is not high, especially the reforms involving people's livelihood such as medical care, education and housing. 66.0% people think that these reforms "do not represent the interests of most middle and lower classes", and 47.4% people think that "although unfair, it is better than no reform". It reflects a strong desire to solve problems through reform.

In terms of the relationship between fairness and efficiency, most civil servants think that they are equally important. 30.5% people think that fairness is more important than efficiency, which is 17 percentage points higher than those who think that efficiency is higher than fairness. It is believed that the formation of vulnerable groups is mainly caused by "unreasonable institutional arrangements". This shows that civil servants pay more attention to the basic role of specific system design and system operation in maintaining social equity.

At present, the main worry about reform and opening up is that "the ecology is destroyed and the economy cannot achieve sustainable development", followed by "corruption cannot be cured" and "polarization". The least worrying issue is that "the reform and opening up will take the capitalist road". It can be seen that this group has become elite and post-materialistic. We can also see that they played down the essence of the social system. They have distanced themselves from the general public in cognition.

4. The confidence in the ruling ability of the * * * production party has not changed, but the trust and confidence in the party's theoretical propaganda, ruling foundation, solving corruption problems, cadre appointment system and class interests represented by the party have changed.

Civil servants' trust and support for the party has not changed, but there are doubts and confusions on specific issues.

First, confidence in the ruling ability and legitimacy of the * * * production party has not changed. When asked, "If we decide who is in power through universal suffrage now, can the * * * production party become the ruling party?" 64.0% answered "Yes", indicating that most civil servants want the Party to be in power and believe in the Party's ruling ability. 74.7% people think that "representing the interests of workers and peasants intellectuals" affirms the legitimacy of the party's governance.

Second, the trust in the party's theoretical propaganda has become lower. 6 1.3% people think that the foreign ideas you know or are familiar with contradict the propaganda of the CPC Central Committee. For the current public opinion propaganda, 73.5% people think that it is "more publicity and reporting to leaders and less attention to ordinary people"; 70.4% people think that "reporting good news without reporting worries is hollow".

Third, confidence in the party's thorough eradication of corruption and fundamental improvement of the party's work style has weakened. 52.0% of civil servants expressed a lack of confidence that "the Party can eradicate corruption and achieve a fundamental improvement in the party style". 58.0% people think that "in recent years, the people's trust in the party and government has declined compared with the past."

Fourth, the evaluation of the current cadre selection system has become lower. It is believed that the main problems existing in the current appointment of cadres are the serious phenomenon of running away from important positions (accounting for 6 1.2%), cronyism (accounting for 48.0%) and buying and selling officials (accounting for 27.6%), which shows that most people have a negative evaluation of the fairness of cadre selection.

Fifth, the views on the representativeness of the party have undergone major changes. Although it is considered that "intellectuals representing workers and peasants" are the mainstream (74.7%), 36.8% people think that they represent the interests of the privileged class, and another 2 1. 1% people think that * * represents the interests of the rich group. Nearly 50.0% people think that only half of party member or most of party member have failed to "play a vanguard and exemplary role and serve the people wholeheartedly", which is a tributary that cannot be ignored.

5. It is the intellectual elite and government officials who master the social ideological dominance, and the mainstream media is the main way to influence civil servants, which puts forward higher requirements for ideological leadership construction.

Questionnaire analysis shows that the intellectual elite (64.9%) and party and government officials (47.4%) have great influence on the thought and behavior of civil servants. 72.4% people think that their views on the government and the Party are mainly influenced by the Party's policies and the behavior of cadres in party member. The words and deeds that have a great influence on the ideological views of civil servants are television, newspapers and radio (80.0%), the views in books and periodicals, and finally the words and deeds of unit leaders and the views of colleagues and friends. While believing in the mainstream media, they are not satisfied with the contents and methods of public opinion propaganda. Only 12.9% people think that public opinion propaganda is "more comprehensive and objective". It reflects that the demand of civil servants for mainstream media has further increased.

On the issue of the Party's leadership over ideology, 50.0% people think that "the Party's leadership over ideology cannot be shaken at any time", 76.9% people think that "the Party's ability and way to manage ideology must be improved and reformed", and 46.2% people think that "whether ideology has real leadership depends mainly on the scientific and popular nature of the theory". It shows that the civil servant group has put forward higher requirements for ideological guidance.

Only 20.8% people think the information on the Internet is credible. 52. 1% people advocate that information on the internet should be supervised to maintain social stability, and 39.4% people think that information supervision is not conducive to people's more comprehensive and true understanding of various ideas. It shows that civil servants want to have social ideological vitality ("more" through information disclosure) and social security and stability ("one" through regulation).

6. Understand globalization and have a clear understanding of its consequences. While affirming the mixed economy, they are disappointed with the efficiency of public ownership and have different views on whether globalization and economic diversification lead to political and cultural diversification.

Understand globalization and have a clear understanding of globalization. While choosing to support and integrate into globalization, 44.0% people think that they should accept what is beneficial to them and resist and oppose what is unfavorable to them.

. For the understanding of the consequences of globalization, 68.0% people choose "economic globalization must participate in political and cultural globalization". Only 15.0% people think that we should "adhere to the unity of ideology and culture".

We have a clear understanding of the duality of the market economy, and most people think that the spirit of Lei Feng is not contradictory to the socialist market economy. 9 1.8% people think that "the development of market economy has enhanced the internal vitality of socialism", and 38.8% people think that "the development of market economy has strengthened individualism and mercenary"; Fully affirmed the diversification of mixed economy and economic components, and was generally disappointed with the efficiency of public ownership. 5 1.0% people think that mixed ownership is the most efficient, and only 3.0% people think that public ownership is the most efficient. It can be seen that the diversified orientation of the economy has formed a * * * knowledge. The superiority of public ownership needs to be proved by practice.

Whether economic diversification will lead to political diversification, 85.0% people think it is "yes" and "unclear", which shows that it is not only a strong practical requirement but also an obvious trend for civil servants to agree with the globalization and diversification of political ideology and culture.

7. Disagree with the socialist model of the Soviet Union, give priority to positive evaluation of Gorbachev's revolutionary spirit, and tolerate the Soviet Union's exploration after the drastic changes in Eastern Europe.

72.0% people think that the drastic changes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe do not mean that socialism is not superior, and 78.0% people think that the drastic changes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe have a general, small and little impact on their ideals and beliefs. It shows that they do not agree with the socialist model of the Soviet Union.

43.9% people think that "Gorbachev's courage to change his mind and cut into the old system is commendable", 34.7% people think that "Gorbachev deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, and he is one of the greatest figures in the 20th century", 35.7% people think that "he has made historic changes in the Soviet Union, and its significance will become more prominent with the passage of time", while only 20.4% people hold negative comments.

45.6% people think that the social model created by countries after the drastic changes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe is a model of democratic socialism, and 5.8% people hold a completely positive attitude towards it, thinking that it has "found a way out for socialism" and "marked its way to world political civilization". However, only 22.3% people think that the model created after the drastic changes completely deviates from socialism, which is quite different from the mainstream view in academic circles. This shows that: (1) the mainstream views of China academic circles have not had a decisive influence on political elites. (2) Civil servants' tolerance for "more" and "change" has been strengthened.

The above discussion is for reference only and I hope it will help you.