Do you know why BYD has EV triple electric technology and the range just isn't as good as Tesla?

Compare the same class, Tang ev and Maodou x. Tang ev 100km electric consumption 16.56, Maodou x long range version 17.3. How is BYD inferior to Tesla? However, Maodou's actual test range x is even more hanged by Tang ev. Maodou x measured 100km power consumption 25.4, Tang ev measured 100km power consumption 17.5 (borrowed from the netizen's chart) Thus, it can be seen that the Tesla's range not only depends on heaps of batteries, but also depends on the serious false labeling. When it comes to marketing and brand value, BYD is better than Tesla, and when it comes to technology, BYD crushes Tesla. First of all, say BMS. battery management system BMS, the industry leader, say second, no one dares to say first, this is also Tesla can get the technology.

Secondly, let's talk about battery technology. Tesla uses Panasonic 21700, energy density 300wh/kg, at present, ningde era is China's strongest ternary lithium battery, is expected to 2025 will be stabilized mass production of 250wh/kg, BYD at most and this level is about the same. So BYD's battery of the same weight definitely can't run Tesla. Here to add why the first-class battery supplier technology is so good, domestic car companies do not buy Panasonic 21700, or lg's soft pack lithium-ion? That's because these batteries are not our domestic, not enjoy the policy subsidies, so Ningde era and BYD's order to receive soft, with the domestic open white list, Panasonic and LG chemical, Samsung SDI are in the domestic joint venture plant. Ningde era, BYD and Guoxuan are the three major domestic suppliers, will certainly be impacted. These two days the new domestic factory model3 subsidized use LG although chemical battery mileage is lower than the Panasonic battery, but still very competitive.

Lastly, let's talk about the motor. The motors used by Tesla are asynchronous motors and supplier technology. The technology works in two ways with BYD's permanent magnet motors. Asynchronous motors are complex and costly, but have good high-speed performance and durability. The permanent magnet motor has a simple structure, good reliability and low cost. So to summarize, even if BYD holds its own core technology, that's not the most cutting edge technology, self-research ≠ leading. So the range is definitely not as good as Tesla. As we all know, BYD's batteries are safe, so much so that they are in defense service, starting from the first one. f3dm to the current 4th generation dm technology has no battery fire incidents, as it is called EV battery car, of course, battery safety is the most important. On the other hand, Tesla has had over a dozen deaths from battery fires both domestically and internationally since it was introduced, and there is no guarantee of safety. This is not biased with your question. BYD currently leads the industry in battery density and safety. Can't say Tesla's single car series doesn't outperform BYD's, but there is an 1800 mile difference in safety on both sides.

Too much aero is called a waste, too much range many people can't afford to buy it and replace it later in life, and they can't use it on a regular basis. Tesla is a foreign brand that is technologically advanced but not necessarily ahead of BYD or individuals. To be blunt, Chinese people recognize foreign brands like foreign moons. Tesla's mid to high end demand base is not as broad as BYD's. In the long run, BYD is positioned for a huge market of urban and rural rental drops. BYD has mastered triboelectric technology, but still relies on Tesla for sourcing? I went looking for info and found this seems to be true. Tesla launches the Model S in May 2019 with 660 kilometers of operating range. BYD Han is released in July 2020 with a long range version of 605 kilometers.