What are the factors that affect government investment?

I wrote an article for you. Take a look. There is also an article from the Internet, which you can refer to. E-government: upgrading traditional government and recreating enterprise government. In the modern sense, the government has experienced two modes: political leader government and bureaucratic government. With the wide application of information and communication technology, a new type of society-information society is forming, which puts forward new requirements for the government. In order to meet this requirement, a virtual form of government, that is, "e-government", is emerging, which is followed by fundamental changes in the existing administrative management methods of governments in various countries. The dilemma faced by traditional bureaucratic government is based on the big government model with "unity" and "management" as the core in industrial society. However, in the information society, the exhausted bureaucratic government has fallen into many difficulties. First of all, compared with the overall development efficiency of the information society, there is a huge efficiency gap in the management of traditional bureaucratic government. The root cause of this efficiency gap is not the backwardness of management technology and means, but the inherent defects of bureaucracy have already buried incurable efficiency hidden dangers. Because: (1) Because the decision-making power of the government is in the hands of a few technocrats, the grass-roots officials and middle-and lower-level civil servants in the government are just spectators of the government's decision-making, and they generally lack the enthusiasm to participate in management. However, these grassroots officials and junior civil servants are the direct executors of government decision-making. The disunity between decision makers and executors reduces the efficiency of government decision-making. (2) The implementation of "bureaucracy" leads to "blank areas" in governments at all levels, departments and regions. Bureaucracy is the organizational form of bureaucratic government. Its implementation clarifies the division of management responsibilities and authority between administrative organizations and administrative personnel, and plays a decisive role in the standardization and institutionalization of government management. However, in actual management activities, there is inevitably a rigid system in government organizations based on bureaucracy. Especially in the face of dynamic management objects and public affairs, it is difficult for bureaucratic government to make timely and effective policy adjustments, which is the direct reason for the existence of "blank areas" in government management. (3) The traditional bureaucratic government regards management and decision-making as unilateral acts, ignoring the two-way and interactive nature of management activities and the objectivity of government decision-making. The self-positioning of the traditional bureaucratic government is the ruler and manager with the highest authority, which will inevitably lead to the opposition between the manager and the managed. The governed have long been excluded from management activities, and the government's management and decision-making are often only out of the wishful thinking of managers. Due to the lack of necessary social recognition and public support in government management and decision-making, the performance of government management has declined, and management resources have been greatly wasted. The development of informatization has had a great impact on the social center position of bureaucratic government. In traditional society, the government's power to control society is supreme. The development of information network technology has gradually replaced the traditional "official standard system", and the formation and development of network economy has greatly shaken the traditional social center position of the government, which is concentrated in the following three aspects: (1) The government's control over the mass media has declined. The traditional government realizes social control by strictly controlling the mass media. In the 1990s, with the vigorous development of telecommunication liberalization and the trend of internationalization, the government gradually lost its exclusive monopoly on telecommunications. As a new mass media, information network is no longer a technical tool controlled and served exclusively by the government, but exists as a relatively independent social public service facility. The openness of the network world makes it difficult for the government to achieve absolute monopoly and monitoring of network information resources, and citizens no longer simply passively accept government information. With the help of an open and interactive network platform, ordinary citizens can freely express their opinions, viewpoints and opinions, and can realize equal dialogue and consultation with the government. In such a free network world, there will never be an absolute center, and any network node and terminal may become the center of relative significance, and the absolute social center position of traditional government is gradually losing. (2) The formation of global financial network denies the authority of traditional central banks. With the floating exchange rate system replacing the fixed exchange rate system, the world bid farewell to the era when the government decided the currency value and entered a new economic era when the market decided the currency value. The formation of global financial network has accelerated the informatization and networking process of financial market, and it is difficult for the government to realize the segmented management of finance. Fiscal policy and monetary policy will no longer be domestic policies independently formulated and implemented by governments, but will become international policies formed on the basis of "global voting". In this process, the authority of the central bank was replaced by the authority of the financial information market, and even domestic actions could not completely get rid of the influence of the global financial network market. (3) In the government, few people use the word "customer". Most executives don't know who their customers are. They only know how to serve the leaders and superiors, ignoring the real customers. Theoretically, the existence of democratic government is to serve citizens. Enterprises exist for profit, but in fact their money comes directly from customers, while the government's money depends on financial allocation. Government clients are passive. I wish the landlord congratulations on making a fortune.