In today's society, is it only good to be both heritage and innovative? It must not be enough just to pass on the classics.

Thank you, President. How can traditional culture shine, to cite a realistic example, when the Chinese folk music towards the decline of the time, it is twelve such as your side of this beautiful girl creativity will be the perfect fusion of Chinese and Western music, into the Vienna Golden Hall, the Sydney Opera House, the sound of the Boya will be spread to the four sides.

As the saying goes, the name is not correct, first of all, a conceptual analysis, culture refers to the product of human activity, the party's 17th Plenary Session of the Sixth Plenary Session will be summarized as material culture, institutional culture, scientific and technological culture, and spiritual culture; cultural innovation refers to the creation of native culture and the integration of old and new culture regeneration process, the essence of which is the breakthrough and transcendence; cultural heritage refers to the process of cultural transmission in the nation and inheritance.

Considering the current domestic and international situation, and taking into account the social development and the needs of the times, we will elucidate that cultural innovation is more important than cultural inheritance in contemporary China from the four levels of logic: the theory of the age of innovation, the theory of innovation and discernment, the theory of innovation and methodology, and the theory of innovation and value.

First, the theory of innovation era. In today's world, cultural hegemony is rampant, and powerful countries are competing with each other to carry out cultural psychological warfare and export of cultural capital. Under the rule of the logic of capital, China's cultural creations are becoming increasingly carnal, narcissistic, solipsistic, and consumptive, and in the face of the invasion of foreign cultures and the loss of local cultures, it is urgent for China to change from manufacturing to creating.

Second, the discursive theory of innovation. The era and urgency of innovation requires that we must re-examine the relationship between inheritance and innovation, in the face of the rapid development of information technology in today's world, cultural innovation must be in the artifacts, systems, science and technology, the spirit, traditional thought, emerging concepts of the various levels and fields of the full development of traditional culture as one of the theoretical sources of cultural innovation must be inherent in the culture of innovation and its lead to the times of practice and social development.

Third, innovative methodology. To solve the contemporary Chinese cultural crisis and social crisis, so that soft power really become hard truth, we must focus on the key areas of original innovation, to achieve the localization of foreign culture, local culture, the methodological requirements of the times.

Fourth, innovation value theory. Cultural innovation, in its essence, is a multicultural global vision, the culture of all nationalities through the exchange and integration of constantly breaking through the limitations of the national culture of the region and mode of the world, in the integration of continuous transcendence and in the human judgment and trade-offs to obtain a cultural identity, which is the Chinese civilization to the world of cultural declarations.

Today, the world is in a period of great development, great changes and great adjustments, and contemporary China is also in a critical stage of reform and development, to realize the great development and prosperity of socialist culture must be based on the cultivation of innovative talents, and the construction of an innovative country.

Seeking truth and innovation, motivation and strength, seeking to create the reality, motivation and innovation, in the face of the tide of innovation in the new century, JIU students should lead the times, look at the world, and constantly create a Chinese culture with Chinese characteristics, Chinese style and Chinese spirit, worthy of the current era. Thank you all.

The so-called knowledge innovation refers to the process of acquiring new knowledge in basic and technical sciences through scientific research, with the aim of pursuing new discoveries, exploring new laws, creating new doctrines and accumulating new knowledge. We can note that this definition in addition to the meaning of knowledge innovation itself, but also contains a deeper relationship between knowledge innovation and knowledge accumulation. Knowledge innovation has promoted the development of society and technological progress, enabling mankind to move step by step from the primitive society of slash-and-burn cultivation to the civilized and modern society. Accumulation of knowledge is certainly the basis of scientific and technological development, but the driving force of scientific and technological development is not the accumulation of knowledge, but knowledge innovation. Think about it: from the four great inventions to the development of space technology, from the center of the earth to Hawking's big bang view, from Confucius and Mencius to post-modernism, from the eight-legged essay to prose novels ..... Do I need to give too many examples? Without innovation, without innovative consciousness, all the material and cultural achievements of mankind will cease to exist, and mankind will permanently remain in the chaos of the unenlightened. If this is really the case, do we still have the opportunity to sit here today to listen to the other side of the debate on the importance of knowledge accumulation? Without motivation, how can we talk about development? What's the point? What kind of flower can you plant with just soil and seeds, but no water and no sunlight? By sticking to the same old rules, by relying on the same old dead knowledge, by standing still and holding on to what little we have, what can we do? The other side of the defense, please take a look at it, throughout the ages, a variety of better than eloquent facts have proved our point of view: knowledge innovation is more important than the accumulation of knowledge!

To those who think accumulation is more important than innovation

1) Define knowledge too narrowly. The so-called knowledge, it has both perceptual knowledge of things or representations, and rational knowledge of concepts or laws." All aspects of management, systems, technology, etc. contain knowledge.

2) Confusion. Exaggerate the connotation of knowledge accumulation and deliberately narrow the extension of knowledge innovation. In the eyes of the other side, knowledge expansion is accumulation, structural perfection is accumulation, abandonment of the old and new is also accumulation! Then what, may I ask, is knowledge innovation? [Ask the other side to give us an example, even one! （

/link?url=RvzMmFsDKd5Rapzb--wkrLtSEL8PrmBtDUAJ0976OBsm0dp-

This is the first time I've ever seen the world's most important website, and it's the first time I've seen it. kpDqm2RpmTt7c8RrE1dFTEyDdXm9I5T8Q3o_FbAZw4Eitnc9q5ootJ28yfy