What does it mean to say that a person is simple?

Question 1: What do people mean when they say I'm simple [pǔ sù]

[explanation] 1. Simple; No literary talent 2. Be thrifty, not extravagant

Simple is single-minded, simple is pure. Simplicity is single-minded, and it is a pure and refined, simple and beautiful way in the world. Simplicity is simplicity; It also means thrift, not luxury. The language of Zhuangzi? Heaven says, "Be quiet and holy, be king while moving, respect without doing anything, and be simple and the world cannot compete with it for beauty.". "

Question 2: Is it a compliment or a shame to say that a woman is pure? Praise, simplicity is to describe a person's simplicity, not to laugh at others' poverty. It is also used to describe the simplicity and honesty of women.

Question 3: What does it mean to praise a simple mind? Hello, generally speaking, it means her partner. Her partner is simple.

Question 4: What does the girl mean by simplicity? First, they are naive and pure.

Second, it is very reliable.

Third, do things more carefully and seriously.

Fourth, treat people with sincerity.

Fifth, study hard and don't do things that violate the law and discipline.

Sixth, life is more frugal.

Question 5: What do you mean by simple and generous? It means that a person looks comfortable and elegant, not gaudy. As a student, he usually dresses simply and generously.

Question 6: What does it mean to say that a person is simple-|| Generally speaking, it is a compliment, but it depends on the occasion and who else has said it. If the boss says this about you, and your career needs someone with such a personality, it is absolutely 100% praise and appreciation. If your friends say so, you may believe that you think you are good, trustworthy and praised. If the girl you are chasing gives you such an answer, I think it may be.

Question 7: What does it mean to say that a person is honest? 10 depends on who said it and under what circumstances.

Honesty usually refers to responsibility. Honesty, integrity, obedience, obedience, etc.

This word contains rich feelings, sometimes positive, sometimes negative, sometimes both.

For example, if you do something bad, tell others. People say you are honest.

You did a good thing and told many people, and others said you were honest! Actually, it's belittling you. Say you are a complacent fish/chasing fame and praise.

You shared a room with a girl. It's nothing. The girl says you are too honest. Say you are timid.

Question 8: What do candidates mean by saying that your life is simple? 20 points, just ask him! ?

Question 9: What is naive logic? Naive logic is a spontaneous and unsystematic logical process. The so-called spontaneity means that many times, we are using simple logic without realizing it. The so-called non-system, that is, the specific process of naive logic can exist alone. I can use reverse interpretation to analyze this problem, and then use comparative method to analyze another problem, regardless of whether these two problems are related or not, and whether this "differential treatment" is reasonable. Naive logic supports most of our daily lives, and at the same time, it is obvious that this logic will continue to make mistakes. It can explain everything, so it cannot be ruled out. In other words, in simple logic, there is no such concept as "error logic".

Compared with naive logic, the defect of formal logic is that it cannot explain some life events and the logical sources that do not conform to formal logic itself. A concrete example is the language structure "I don't even think ... (noun A) (adjective Z), so ... (noun B) will be ... (adjective Z)?" Formal logic cannot be explained. Naive logic can be interpreted as: the major premise "A is more Z than B", the minor premise "A is not Z" and the conclusion "B is not Z". The reason is that formal logic does not admit that sentences expressing contrast can be used as propositions of syllogism, so it cannot explain the process of "contrast" in naive logic. In addition, the logical processes such as dumb, immersion, substitution, coloring, inverse explanation, near explanation and analogy in naive logic are incomprehensible to formal logic, but they exist in life.

Virtual, for example, let's assume that there is a rope with a completely unified appearance, which can be used to extract objects with infinite mass. Here, from the point of view of formal logic, this logical process is completely meaningless, because the premise assumption deviates from the objective facts. But what affects people's actions are all kinds of imaginary scenes. Physical limits are imaginary, such as absolute zero. It is impossible to achieve, but it does not deny the meaning of absolute zero just because it is impossible to achieve.

Infiltration, such as the idea of "near Zhu Zhechi, near Mexico, black", although we all know that there are problems, it is always inevitable to fall into this stereotype when considering the problem. For example, students with good grades must be good at everything-although everyone knows that this is problematic, how many classes can avoid this stereotype when evaluating students with good grades? If formal logic is absolute, this situation is impossible.

Change people, such as "what I think is good, others think it is good" or conversely "what is useful to others will be useful to me". Moreover, it is the negative form of the two expressions-nothing more than the premise that "I am irreplaceable with others" and nothing more than the reverse use of substitution. Actually, whether it's good or not, we won't know until we try. So can we say that it is useless to replace this simple logic? I can't. Because "substitution" plays an incentive role, for example, when I come to the conclusion that "I think good things are also good for others", I will use words and deeds to urge others to use that thing. It is impossible for formal logic to realize the value of substitution, because in the view of formal logic, this is a problem of stealing concepts and rambling.

Color, such as a musician, a painter and a sculptor, will be recognized as different conceptual objects when they see the same artistic event, namely melody, color and space. In fact, this is the conclusion that these three types of artists have "smeared" the same event with their own attributes, and they have given the objective world their own "color". Analyzing problems with formal logic is a coloring process, but it obviously doesn't realize this.

Reverse interpretation, that is, the events that happened later in time sequence are used to explain the events that happened first. We say that Wang Jingwei is a conspirator because he followed and defended Sun Yat-sen in the early stage and became a traitor in the later stage. The reason why he can be said to be a schemer needs a reverse explanation ―― the fact that he was a traitor later explains his previous "good performance". From the consistency of formal logic, it can't explain that Wang Jingwei changed from a "good guy" to a "bad guy".

For example, when we entered the room, we saw a man sitting in front of a table with a bottle of water on it. We will automatically assume that the owner of this bottle of water is that person, because they are very close. This is the proximity explanation caused by physical proximity. There is also a close explanation caused by close relationship, that is, if junior high school students are not good at arithmetic, junior high school teachers may think that students' primary school teachers have problems with their teaching methods. The reason is "... >>"