Does the upsurge of "Chinese studies" still need "cold" thinking?

Category: Education/Learning/Examination

Problem description:

In the face of the tradition that has disappeared in reality, the actual effect of letting primary and secondary school students "read classics" with a blank sheet of paper is doubtful. We should also be cautious in revitalizing "Chinese studies". How to teach and what to teach cannot be solved simply by "reading classics".

Can you give me some advice?

Analysis:

"Chinese studies", especially "enlightenment", should be thought calmly. "Cultural inheritance" depends on "national studies", and "classic ancient prose" is difficult to read. As we all know, I have seen the Chinese-English translation of "Famous Works" and I am deeply "sorry". Primary and secondary school students choose to study ancient literature.

The ancient poetry is "beyond reproach". Reading classics and learning idioms and allusions are followed by pronunciation and stories.

Especially "disyllabic words" and "polysemous words" are "confused" at a young age. At our age, we have a deep understanding.

"Apply what you have learned" cannot be neglected. "Cultural literacy" is not necessarily "the same". I have always thought that "ancient prose" can only be used.

What's the problem? Can't "meaningless words" be "vernacular"? How to "inherit" is really a "problem"!