Six views on college students' public welfare entrepreneurship

Six views on college students' public welfare entrepreneurship

The public welfare field pays more attention to ideas than benefits. Although it is a good thing, it is not easy to communicate, not to see if there is cooperation value, but to see if there is the same idea. So what do college students need to pay attention to in public welfare entrepreneurship?

Viewpoint 1: Public welfare entrepreneurship is a new model for college students to practice innovation and entrepreneurship.

College students' public welfare entrepreneurship is a prelude to commercial entrepreneurship, and public welfare entrepreneurship projects can also be transformed into commercial projects in the future. College students' entrepreneurial practice does not have to start with the establishment of commercial enterprises, nor does it have to start enterprises to generate economic benefits. They can also participate in entrepreneurial practice by establishing sustainable non-profit organizations that take into account economic interests, research and public welfare activities. Public welfare entrepreneurship emphasizes the spirit of innovation and practice, and the practice of public welfare entrepreneurship is the sublimation of social practice, which makes up for the deficiency of current educational practice.

Viewpoint 2: Public welfare entrepreneurship is a new way to enhance college students' sense of social responsibility.

Another way of saying public welfare entrepreneurship is social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurs can go further by choosing an organizational form that combines economic goals with social goals at the beginning of their business, which is of greater significance to society, individuals and ecology. Traditional entrepreneurship refers to entrepreneurship, emphasizing economic benefits. Public entrepreneurship emphasizes social value orientation and public welfare, which is a good practical education model. Coping with the utilitarian mentality of the current society.

Viewpoint 3: Public welfare entrepreneurship is a new channel to solve the employment problem of college students.

Mass entrepreneurship is a blue ocean and will become a new choice for college students' career development. In China, there is a huge social demand for public welfare entrepreneurship. With the advancement of government management system reform and? Small government, big society? With the in-depth development of China's economy, some state-supported organizations that provide quasi-public goods will be transformed into non-profit organizations to provide services for vulnerable groups. The employment ratio of non-profit organizations in China is 0.34%, while the world average is close to 10%. It can be seen that public welfare entrepreneurship will open up a brand-new world for the employment of college students in China.

Viewpoint 4: Public welfare entrepreneurship is a new way to enrich the cultural life of university campus.

China Youth Newspaper Center conducted a survey of thousands of netizens through Sina. Com shows that 96.4% of people are in favor of college students' participation in public welfare entrepreneurship, and 38.2% are very much in favor. Participating in public welfare entrepreneurship can realize your own growth, change yourself and change the world. Public welfare entrepreneurship has a very good mass base among college students. Public welfare entrepreneurship has broken through the two conventional modes of college students looking for jobs or starting businesses. From the perspective of social demand, it can be predicted that it has broad development prospects.

Viewpoint 5: Public welfare entrepreneurship is a new means to satisfy college students' pursuit of a sense of accomplishment.

In the past few decades, especially in the last decade, the criteria for measuring a person's success in society are relatively simple. In the era of utilitarianism, creating wealth? Ability is the most critical sign to measure a person's success. With the development of society, people's values are increasingly diversified. In the future, many colleges and universities will be more proud of cultivating social entrepreneurs.

Viewpoint 6: Public welfare entrepreneurship is a new force to promote the development of social welfare undertakings.

Non-profit entrepreneurial industries include non-profit innovative industries, social enterprises and corporate social responsibility. One day, there will be more social enterprises. The employment of the whole non-profit entrepreneurial industry in China will definitely reach 5% of the whole country, and the GDP will also exceed 5%. Some countries in Europe and America have reached this level. In the past 30 years, China has made great progress in economic development, and in the next decade, China will also make great progress in social development. University is a good cradle and booster for the development of public welfare entrepreneurship or social entrepreneurship. College students' participation in public welfare entrepreneurship will undoubtedly greatly promote the better development of social welfare undertakings.

20 suggestions for public welfare entrepreneurship: 1. Before entering the public welfare field, you'd better do something else: do something else first, it's easy to get to the point and accumulate experience.

2, bring your own dry food for two years: innovation in the public welfare field, innovation in the social field, it is difficult to find angel investment like business, and it needs word of mouth. Although there are incubators to provide small grants, it is not enough. You can't let public welfare make you a vulnerable group. At least two years without making money or being disturbed. And the biggest social responsibility is the family burden. It is not easy for many institutions to live and die.

3. Compared with strength and efficiency, the blue ocean was born. The operating concept and products are not based on efficiency. Social enterprises only see the inefficiency of NGOs, so they use business to operate. But even social enterprises can hardly compete with enterprises for efficiency.

4. Find a prescription with the patient. Many times we often go to the patient with a prescription.

5, there is no need to insist, don't give up at will. A model needs to be adhered to for a certain period of time, and it will see the dawn after two or three years.

6. Doing it is fate, and one counts as one. It is possible that after a certain scale, the expectations around will be high and the pressure will be great.

7. The public welfare sector can't live without big names, but it can't rely on big names. When the big names are exhausted, we should do it according to our own design.

8. Only innovation has a way out. The field of public welfare is not to solve social problems, but to do experiments to solve problems and then promote them, and the task is completed.

9. We are strong people, but we only met with temporary difficulties. Non-profit organizations should have confidence in negotiations and help them solve problems. If you can help them spend money well, it will also help the sponsor solve his problem to some extent.

10, cooperation can only be achieved if the cooperation status is different. Government bureaucracy is not easy to solve social problems, and enterprises also have weaknesses. If they can't make money and share the benefits, it will be difficult to establish a project. This is why non-governmental organizations have suitable space.

1 1, the economy is not independent and the personality is not independent. If an NGO's income comes from only one sponsor, it is difficult to play games. Should be pluralistic, should be independent, in order to gain respect. If you are attached to only one interest group, it is easy to be abandoned.

12, blindly accepting projects is like drinking salt water. Some even fall into repetitive projects and talk about projects, even if they lose money for the operation of the organization, they forget the core competitiveness and ideas, which will make the organization work harder and harder, and it is difficult for the project to form a sustainable effect. Sometimes it helps to stop.

13, the core cost is sustainable. There are two ways to increase the core cost. One is that the same team sells several times more, but it is also dangerous and will be very tired. The other is to find a sponsor to fund the core expenses. For example, social workers in Shenzhen are purchased by post, and a certain proportion of them take care of the management expenses of public institutions.

14, because people set things up, they bring people themselves. No one has dug in the public welfare field and there is no talent reserve.

15, high-level talks about mission, middle-level talks about specialty and first-level talks about treatment. I think the treatment of middle and low-level personnel should be as close as possible to the market price and give decent income. In foreign countries, there is little difference in the income of employees in non-profit organizations, but there is a big difference among senior employees. Middle-and low-level employees may have higher wages than enterprises at the same level.

16, there are many publicity projects, few publicity organizations, and no publicity for individuals. Organizations also have various problems. It is not good to look at public welfare from the moral high ground. It is good to give us a chance to do things, but it is dangerous to think that we have occupied the moral high ground.

17, values should be set early and talk more. Values can help management and identify whether this person is suitable or not. For example, religious background is easier to organize and manage, and non-religious non-profit organizations have more frequent staff turnover. The job of institutional leaders is to constantly promote their own values.

18, social problem solving. We are solving social problems, and we should mobilize social resources to solve them. The more people involved, the more people will understand the problem. Your success lies in how many people have been mobilized to solve social problems, not how many social problems have been solved. Find support groups and allies.

19, there is a kind of love called letting go. It is difficult for entrepreneurs to leave, and the public thinks that the institution is him. But for organizations, it is very dangerous if they are all maintained by founders. If you make a social innovation, you must leave your job within three to five years. There should be a mechanism to leave with dignity. A large number of organizations are dangerous in the hands of one person.

20. The process of lifelong cultivation and self-improvement. The biggest beneficiary of public welfare should be ourselves. To enjoy this process, we should not be motivated by the goals of the organization, but should enjoy this process.

;