In Qing Dynasty, Ganjia School was a textual research school, which emphasized that "only Han is the letter" and "exegesis is based on the clear meaning", which was close to China's ancient classics,

In Qing Dynasty, Ganjia School was a textual research school, which emphasized that "only Han is the letter" and "exegesis is based on the clear meaning", which was close to China's ancient classics, also known as Sinology, and Chinese Confucianism was China's modern classics. First of all, it should be made clear that Confucian classics has been prosperous since Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty practiced the principle of respecting Confucius alone. At that time, Confucian classics had the style of ancient prose. Today's classics are easy to express, while the real language exegesis is promoted by studying China's ancient classics. Therefore, we can't unilaterally say that China Confucianism is Confucian classics.

Secondly, the early Qing Dynasty was directly influenced by the retro school in the late Ming Dynasty. They advocate Chinese studies and practicality under the banner of retro. For example, Gu advocated Chinese studies and opposed the hollowing out of Neo-Confucianism in Song and Ming Dynasties, creating a good atmosphere. The Ganjia School laid a solid foundation for document semantics. However, the textual research on the social unrest in late Qing Dynasty divorced from reality (social reality) has been gradually ignored by people. So the real school appeared.

In a word, the crux of the landlord problem lies in the incorrect correspondence between China's ancient classics and China's modern classics. "Clear and fair exegetical interpretation" is close to the current text.