Can't human curiosity stop human cloning? So which is more important, science and technology or ethics? Is subverting tradition a technological innovation?

Human cloning will happen sooner or later, but it is still a long way from now.

Traditional ideas will be updated, just like blood transfusion technology, organ transplantation and IVF, which have caused an uproar in the ethical field and subverted tradition. Now we can treat this technology correctly. Aren't these technologies just technological innovations? Moreover, Europe and the United States are ambiguous about human cloning, and maybe the government will agree to develop human cloning. When cloning technology is mature, human ethics has changed, cloning will no longer be so pedantic, and all ethical issues are only human speculation. Who knows what will happen next?