Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional virtues - The difference between prefabricated buildings and traditional buildings

The difference between prefabricated buildings and traditional buildings

1. Prefabricated building: all components of the building, such as beams, columns, floors, internal and external wallboard, doors and windows, stairs, connecting nodes, plumbing electrical equipment, etc. It needs to be processed and manufactured in the factory, and then transported to the construction site for assembly and connection, thus building a prefabricated building.

2. Traditional architecture: The common traditional architecture usually adopts brick structure or steel structure, which is very expensive and will be much more troublesome than the construction process of prefabricated buildings.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of equipped architecture?

Advantages of matching construction: 1, short construction period, because all components are assembled and transported directly to the site for assembly; 2. It is more energy-saving and environment-friendly, because this kind of building produces less construction waste.

Disadvantages of equipment architecture: 1. Compared with traditional buildings, the cost of this kind of building is higher; 2. It is difficult to use production equipment to produce large buildings; 3. The seismic performance and impact resistance are weak.

Is the prefabricated building safe?

Many people may not know much about this kind of building. In fact, the safety factor of this kind of building is not lower than that of traditional buildings, so I think if we want to build new buildings, we can completely consider prefabricated buildings.

Now, if you want to assemble a prefabricated building, you must plan the size in advance, because this building has very high requirements for size and the data must be accurate. If there are errors, there will also be errors in processing and construction, which will affect the later assembly.