What is the difference between traditional surgery and minimally invasive surgery for hemorrhoids?

There are five differences between minimally invasive surgery for hemorrhoids and traditional surgery: first, minimally invasive surgery is a concept that brings the best treatment effect with minimal trauma. Second, the surgical instruments used are different. Minimally invasive surgery is the product of modern science and technology. In more cases, high-quality surgical instruments are needed, the treatment cost is higher, and the requirements for surgical instruments are more. Thirdly, the operation process is different, because with the help of modern surgical instruments and technology, the operation is simpler, the operation time is shorter, the trauma and pain to patients are less, and the application scope is wider. Minimally invasive surgery for hemorrhoids usually takes about 10 minutes, while traditional hemorrhoids surgery takes 20 to 30 minutes. Fourth, the treatment effect is different. Minimally invasive surgery has a wider application range, higher status, more in line with human physiological characteristics, and better therapeutic and long-term effects. 5. Different surgical risks. Although minimally invasive surgery is simple, it requires high surgical instruments, so the risk of using good instruments is small, and the risk of using poor instruments is high, which has high comprehensive requirements for professional doctors and hospitals. Although the operation is simple, due to the high position of the operation, the requirements for the surgeon are also high, otherwise serious complications are prone to occur, and minimally invasive surgery is more prone to side effects.