The traditional morality should not keep the argumentative essay

"Tao" means everything, "virtue" means everything that carries "Tao"; "Tao" means reason, "virtue" means good behavior. "The first thing you need to do is to get your hands dirty. The truths of "Tao" are all present in "Virtue", and the "virtues" of "Virtue" are all generated in "Tao". The "character" of the "virtues" all arise in the "Tao. Therefore, without the Tao, there is no virtue, and without virtue, the existence of the Tao is invisible. Without virtue, the existence of the Tao is invisible. Only when there is Tao can there be virtue, and only when there is virtue can there be Tao, that is, "morality". Since ancient times, there has never been a great man who did not have "morality", nor has there ever been a bad man who had "morality". The first thing that I saw today was a thing that undermined the "morality" of the world.

When the rain stopped, I went to buy a dollar and a half of pork liver, but the shopkeeper gave me a dollar for the liver when he said it was a dollar and a half. I was the first time to go out to buy things, and do not know how to see enough to the amount, take the pig liver and rush home. When I got home, my mom said I had been cheated, and I was furious. Is this what Chinese morality is all about?

Morality is about the quality of the people and the prosperity of the nation. Yet that store owner, undermined the quality of the Chinese people. Think about it, they even cheat Chinese people, let alone foreigners? If foreigners come to buy something, won't they ask for a lion's share? They even cheat Chinese people of 50 cents, let alone foreigners of a few dollars, tens of dollars, or even hundreds or thousands of dollars? For the sake of profit, they actually go so far as to throw away our ancestors' hard-earned face! The good character of the Chinese people is being lost to people like them! They're a disgrace to China, to the Chinese people! Think about Qian Xuesen, Deng Jiaxian, the old generation of outstanding scientists with life, happiness, sacrifice of self-interest in exchange for the face of the Chinese people, the dignity of the Chinese people, is about to be similar to the owner of the store such as a small move for that small interests, "small" "trickery "I'm sorry to say that I've lost all my face, and I'm saddened by the foreigners pointing and scolding us Chinese for being unethical and ungenerous. (China Composition Network)

Now, there are already foreigners scolding us Chinese. Take a look. In the United States, Pearl Harbor, you can see only written in Chinese "garbage cans here"; in the Royal Palace of Thailand, you can see only written in Chinese "please flush after defecation"; in Notre Dame in Paris, you can also see only written in Chinese In Notre Dame, you can also see written in Chinese only, "Please keep quiet". Now, do we want foreigners to write "Please don't cheat money" in Chinese only? Wake up, those who undermine China's 5,000 years of traditional culture and morality.

So we should have a good morality and change this situation. Our "virtue" should be embodied in the "Tao", so that foreigners know that we are "virtuous" and "Tao" people, China is not a "virtuous" and "Tao" people, but a "virtuous" and "Tao" people. Let foreigners know that we are people with "virtue" and "way", and that China is not that kind of low-quality people! We have to inherit the traditional Chinese culture and morality, so that foreigners are always thumbs up to China. "Morality" is related to the quality of the people, the prosperity of the nation, without a good morality of the nation, it is impossible to prosper! If the Chinese people want not to be bullied by others, not to be laughed at by others, and not to have their country ravaged by others, they have to have a good morality! Remember, you are never representing yourself, you are representing the whole of China, the 1.3 billion Chinese people! You can make foreigners praise China, but you can also make foreigners laugh at China. The conditions and path of praise are always more complicated and difficult than the conditions of shame.

The thesis on morality Part II

Just started to see the word "sub-morality", it is necessary for me to think of some words, "the beginning of man, the nature of goodness," there are always some people still have a good heart, for a long time, people are accustomed to the good and evil poles of morality, the good and evil poles. For a long time, people have been accustomed to moral thinking in the poles of good and evil, not realizing that there may be some degree of evil in good and some degree of good in evil. The sub-moral problem is a real life real moral problem that we can't help but face, good and evil are the unity of moral contradictions, and they exist at the same time like shadows and shadows.

Mao Zedong in "Theory of Contradiction" proposed: "All contradictory things, interconnected, not only under certain conditions *** in a unity, and under certain conditions transform each other, this is the full meaning of the contradictory homogeneity." In terms of moral hierarchy, sub-morality is secondary to perfect morality. In relation to perfect morality, it is imperfect, inferior, and morality with flaws.

Perfect morality is the high morality that everyone should pursue, and it is our moral goal. Sub-morality, on the other hand, is the real morality that we must face. There is a crime of bribery of public security director, he "often do things first, after receiving money", "and never take the initiative to ask for, promised to others on the matter must be done", this person's behavior is different from those who received money and do not do things for others, and even to the people who asked him to extort. This person's behavior is different from those corrupt officials who accept money from others but do not do anything for them, and even extort and blackmail those who ask for help from him, so "he accepts bribes, but others still say that he is a 'good official'". Many of us have grown up with the idea of "good guys" and "bad guys" and believe that a good guy is a good guy and a bad guy is a bad guy, and that the two are always distinct.

But objectively, the real absolute good guy hardly exists. Even Mao Zedong said that it is not difficult for a person to do one good deed, but to do good deeds and not bad deeds in one's life.

Rousseau was a French Enlightenment thinker, educator, writer and philosopher, who not only stole when he was young, but even fornicated with a noblewoman he called his mother, and he was not very good at relationships because of his habitual frankness. But this did not prevent him from being a great man, for he had the courage to write both his good and faithful side and his mean and nasty side in his Confessions, "My heart is fully exposed, exactly as you have seen it with your own eyes; call those countless beings to me, and let them hear my confessions, and let them sigh for all my depravity, let them sighs, let them be ashamed of all my wickedness, and then, let each of them expose his heart with the same sincerity, and see who dares to say, I am better than this man!" Note 1 Those who have read the Confessions may feel that Rousseau is really not a decent man, but unfortunately there is still no one who dares to challenge Rousseau's statement, no one who dares to put his sincerity and meanness, his goodness and his nastiness, all in words and add: I am a little better than Rousseau! This goes to show that authentic good people who meet the dualists' criteria for good people are not rare, if they even exist at all.

The vast majority of us have a sub-moral character.

The fact that many people in a social group are not saints, and many are not inherently evil, presupposes that many people may be faced with a conflict between the good and the not-so-good at any time. When this is unavoidable, how do we get such a great intermediate group to gravitate toward the good, rather than cause them to ultimately choose to turn their backs on it. To solve this problem, we must have a clear understanding of the issues we face and develop a dialectical way of thinking.

Should abandon the kind of either/or, black or white absolute opposites thinking mode, should be brave enough to admit that between black and white there are also countless levels of gray scale. The emergence of the phenomenon of sub-morality is also a kind of social progress, because in the case of the impossibility of completely eradicating illegal behavior, the phenomenon of sub-morality raises the moral bottom line of the lawbreakers, and its direct consequence is to reduce the harmfulness of the society. In the history of human society, the development trend of law and morality is to bring more and more things that were originally ignored by people into view, giving more space and freedom to human body and mind. So the emergence of sub-moral phenomenon does not cause the original moral outlook of the decline or collapse.

On the contrary, the loss of sub-morality or intolerance of sub-moral phenomena will make some criminals more heartless.

Since the promotion of sub-morality is not to condone crime, and will not affect the law's crackdown on illegal behavior. Then, recognizing the value of sub-morality in "regulating" the behavior of a particular group of people, and advocating it in a proper way and manner among a particular group of people can minimize the harm done by offenders to society and contribute to social stability. Sub-morality, as a supplement to traditional moral evaluation standards, shows that modern morality attaches importance to the weak, marginal and neglected moral values.

We should have the concept of dialectical thinking and establish a dialectical way of thinking. The "evil" in sub-moral behavior is firmly denounced, and the "good" in sub-moral behavior is appropriately affirmed, encouraged and guided. I'm sorry, but I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do this, but I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do this, but I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do this.