Yue Yunpeng Ren red is illegal much, was angrily criticized by the Peking University professor no culture, De Yunshe is how to respond?

Yue Yunpeng's comedy, very good. With Sun Yue partner, interpretation of many years, gradually from the small theater to the big stage. There are also many people know them, like them. However, there are a lot of right and wrong in people. A Peking University professor disliked Yue Yunpeng, saying that he had no culture and did not pretend to understand. Yue Yunpeng did not respond, Deyunsha's peak responded, saying that comedy is just a tease, don't take it seriously.

A, Yue Yunpeng red, Peking University professor disliked his lack of culture, De Yunshe overbearing response

Yue Yunpeng's comedy there is a lot of body language, and occasionally, Yue Yunpeng will laugh, these are some of the small shortcomings of Yue Yunpeng's comedy. Many listeners will forgive Yue Yunpeng's, because his performance on stage, very real. However, there are some who are demanding, such as a Peking University professor.

The Peking University professor is from the Chinese Department, and his study of words is naturally spot on. He was also right when he said Yue Yunpeng was uneducated. Because Yue Yunpeng did not say the right number of words in the Xinhua Dictionary, nor did he seriously match the words. Are these not problems? Indeed they are; should they be criticized? Indeed should.

But, Yue Yunpeng's culture level is limited, which is known to many people. Criticizing Yue Yunpeng from this angle is a bit too much. Guo Degang, the head of Deyunsha, didn't say anything, while Gao Feng had a different understanding of this. He believes that comedy is an art, which is not true. But there are some mistakes in comedy, and everyone recognizes that.

What the old man passed down, even if it is wrong, no one to correct. Many comedians are wrong, and no one corrects them. Characters in the comedy, would have been a bottle of dissatisfaction half a bottle of wobble. It is not a pillar lecture, no need to be harsh. Of course, it would be better if they knew it and corrected it. An example was also given of the 87th Spring Festival Gala's comic opera "The clever pair of shadow couplets", which was wrong, and people didn't criticize it harshly.

The meaning of these remarks by Gao Feng could not be clearer, that is, the Peking University professor is begging to be blamed. It's not that he's wrong, but he's asking too much. Besides, comedy is about interaction and joy. If it's word-for-word, many people won't want to hear it. As Guo Degang said, if every word is an allusion, listening to comedy is like listening to heavenly books, people won't listen to it.

Two, Yue Yunpeng's culture is limited, this is a fact, but comedy is an art, the art of communication

Yue Yunpeng's culture is indeed limited, because he did not have a higher education, and there is not a lot of time to learn. He has been a security guard, worked in a noodle shop, and then cleaned up in the De Yun She. This is such a limited culture of people, but can become everyone's favorite comedian, not an inspirational story?

Yue Yunpeng himself knows that his culture is limited. When he was performing "De Yun Yi Brother" on the stage of "Joyful Comedian", he said that his culture is limited. The fact that people have admitted it, and a professor from the North University still says it, is a bit of a blowhard.

Yue Yunpeng is also aware of his limited culture, and that's why he put a lot of effort into learning comedy. Guo Degang once said that many people in De Yunshe advised him to dismiss Yue Yunpeng. However, Guo Degang said that he would not starve Yue Yunpeng if he had a mouthful of his own food. Yue Yunpeng with the strength of the success, learned, should be quite a lot.

Guo Degang also did not graduate from college, who would say he has limited culture? The previous veteran comedians did not have degrees, who would say they were not cultured? The art of comedy is not quite the same as other art forms because this art form requires interaction, i.e., smashing hangs. The Deyunsha's smashing hang, for one, is awesome, whether it's Guo Degang, Yu Qian, or Yue Yunpeng, Sun Yue and others.

The Peking University professor criticized people by grabbing only one point, which makes him seem not so broad-minded. It's not that the Peking University professor is wrong, but he has no tolerance for others. Yue Yunpeng's comedy, which is already very good, is a bit of an imposition if he has to beg for blame.

Three, the professor said Yue Yunpeng culture is limited, belonging to the mean more than enough, not enough goodwill

The words of the professor of the University of North America, there is no mistake. Yue Yunpeng is indeed "limited culture" company people. However, as a professor of the Chinese Department of Peking University, not to teach properly, but to accuse a person of limited cultural level, the words themselves, is not limited culture? As a professor, is not to understand the traditional culture, even if someone else is wrong, can you point it out directly?

Saying that people's culture is limited, is this what a professor should say? Some people say that the Peking University professor pointed out to Yue Yunpeng for Yue Yunpeng's good. From this perspective, it is OK. However, in terms of cultural cultivation, it is not right. At the very least, it is unkind.

Because when a professor of Beida points out the shortcomings of others, do you need this kind of enlightenment? Isn't there another, more euphemistic, more comforting way? If there isn't, it means that this Peking University professor's cultural knowledge is not very high (this knowledge refers to emotional intelligence)!

Survival and life in society, the need to point out directly? We are all out to mix, give face. But Peking University professor did not give, but directly dislike. Some people feel that this is done to let Yue Yunpeng know what is wrong. Isn't it a bad way to explore? Raise a little bit of their own doubts, can not?

Some people say that this Peking University professor is such a straight person and he has good intentions. Good intentions can do bad things, can't they? Don't talk about good intentions, just as don't talk about love. What this Peking University professor is doing gives the impression that he is not accusing, but rubbing it in.

What the Peking University professor did was a bit mean, really. Although he usually likes to communicate in this way and thinks it's better. It's his personality and no one would care. But would others be comfortable communicating with people in such a way? His old man didn't care! To put it nicely, it is kindness, but to put it badly, it is selfishness. Confucius all said, do not do unto others what you would not have them do unto you. I hope this Peking University professor will be more careful when expressing his views! What do you think?