Network communication must be able to replace the traditional way of communication, we are the positive side, may I ask you, we should be from which aspects to say, to debate this topic?

I think it should be the angle of sophistry, in fact, it is quite difficult to argue, because here there is a "certain", and secondly, I prefer the traditional way of communication, a lot of people are also, to change the mindset of the quite difficult, because first of all their own on the can not persuade themselves.

But, after all, it is a debate, there is a classic saying "debate to the death of sophistry it"

Not what aspect is not aspect, those who state the aspect of the only thesis statement and the closing argument when the statement to use, in the free attack and free debate to prepare the material can be used on the chances of 1%, I'm not a debater, but I put the debate on the table, I'm not the best. I'm not a debater, but I see the debate very clearly, because I always do President (moderator), so want to win we have to know ourselves and know the enemy, how to know ourselves and know the enemy, that is, if you are the opposite side of how you will attack the other side, well wait for you to think about it well after (in fact, the real opposite side estimates eight or nine will think about it to say that) you should think of sophistry countermeasures ~