Should the traditional personnel file system end? What kind of policy termination can be adopted?

The traditional personnel file system is a sign of the transition from "police state" to "administrative state" (later "welfare state"), and it is a system of managing officials. It has nothing to do with ordinary people-farmers, the public outside the system and other vulnerable groups or no files or files are of little significance.

The traditional personnel file system is an appendage of China's cadre system and a typical symbol of cadres' identity. Therefore, it is essentially an identity system. In today's increasingly market-oriented economy and increasingly democratic politics, the policy defects of this identity-based personnel file system have been exposed.

Setting up "talent barrier" limits the rational flow of human capital and reduces the development degree of human resources. The real development of a society lies in actively and maximally developing human resources. Marx once said in Das Kapital that "capital can only be increased in circulation", and so can human capital. In a country where human resources are still scarce, excessive "talent barriers" can only hinder individual freedom, economic prosperity and social development. At the same time, this "talent barrier" has also caused "obvious waste" and "hidden waste" of human resources, excluding some people who are suitable for certain positions and taking on some unsuitable people; Those who are willing to hold certain positions are excluded, while those who are "in Cao Cao's heart and in Han Dynasty" are strongly retained. Therefore, the phenomenon of "rough work", "slow work" and "slow work" under the unit system is inevitable, and the low work efficiency and system benefit are also reasonable.