Green gdp when "on the throne

As early as 2004, China proposed at the government level to replace the original GDP index with a green GDP index, but it has not been applied.

There is resistance to both objective accounting and subjective conceptual factors.

Asset pricing of resources and environment is difficult to account for. China's mineral resources, water resources, forest resources and many other assets pricing is not in accordance with the market pricing, so that the green GDP accounting discrepancies. At present, experts in various fields have studied a number of measurement models and methods, although each focus, but also have their own shortcomings, can only be gradually supplemented and improved in practice.

Subjectively, the implementation of green GDP implies a profound change of concept. Once the green GDP is implemented, it will certainly bring about a major change in the cadre assessment system.

It is gratifying to see that in recent years, the GDP assessment is gradually diluted. With the two sessions held in February this year, around the expected GDP target this year have been released, downward adjustment of the growth rate has become the "new normal". In addition to Tibet's target is the same as last year, Hebei and other 29 provincial-level administrative regions have clearly downward adjusted the GDP growth target; Shanghai simply put forward only "stable economic growth", the first to propose the abolition of the GDP assessment. Provinces have adjusted downward the GDP growth target, is to blindly pursue the scale and speed of GDP from the past, to focus on the efficiency of GDP growth direction change.

But the downward adjustment of the GDP growth target or cancel can only be regarded as a beginning, "behind the introduction of the assessment system is scientific, perfect, whether the real consideration of the ecological environment factors is the key".