Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Almanac inquiry - The difference between transformed robbery and afterwards robbery

The difference between transformed robbery and afterwards robbery

Related provisions of transformed robbery: Article 269 of the Criminal Law. A robber who commits theft, fraud or robbery and uses violence or threatens violence on the spot to hide stolen goods, resist arrest or destroy criminal evidence shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of Article 263 of this Law.

As can be seen from the above, the premise is that theft, fraud and robbery have been committed; The purpose is to hide stolen goods, resist arrest or destroy criminal evidence; By using violence or threatening to use violence; Only when the above three elements are met at the same time can the transformed robbery be constituted;

The crime of robbery afterwards is to commit another crime for the purpose of illegally possessing other people's property after the end of the previous crime (the object of the previous crime is different from the object of the latter robbery);

For example, after the crime of intentional injury, it is said that the victim can't move, and when he sees property on him, he takes it away. This is robbery afterwards;

Extended data:

Robbery (Article 263 of the Criminal Law) is an act of forcibly seizing public or private property on the spot by violence, coercion or other means for the purpose of illegal possession.

The so-called violence means that the perpetrator strikes or forces the victim's body. The violent act of robbery refers to the act of beating or coercing the victim's body and robbing others' property for the purpose of excluding the victim's resistance.

Other methods here refer to the methods that the perpetrator uses other than violence or coercion to make the victim unable to resist. Any natural person who has reached the age of 14 and has criminal responsibility can constitute the subject of robbery.