The leopard didn't see the zodiac when he went out.

Surveillance in front of a citizen in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province once photographed a leopard briefly entangled with a dog and then jumped off the wall. At present, two leopards have been recovered, and the third one is still looking for it.

On the morning of 20021April 19, three leopards over 2 years old escaped from Hangzhou Wildlife Park. On April 2 1 day, the wildlife world searched independently, and one was captured with an anesthetic gun on the morning of April 2 1 day. The reasons for running away are the negligence of park managers and running away during cleaning.

The leopard has escaped! How to blame for the "hide-and-seek" incident? civil liability

If the leopard escapes and hurts people, the zoo, as a keeper and manager, should bear the tort liability.

Article 1245 of the Civil Code: If the raised animals cause damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear the tort liability. However, if it can be proved that the damage was caused by the intentional or gross negligence of the infringer, it cannot bear or reduce the responsibility. Article 1246 If anyone violates the management regulations and fails to take safety measures for animals, causing damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear the tort liability. However, if it can be proved that the damage was intentionally caused by the infringer, the liability can be reduced.

Administrative responsibility Article 106 of the Law on Work Safety: If the main person in charge of the production and business operation unit fails to organize rescue immediately or goes AWOL or escapes during the accident investigation and handling, he will be demoted and dismissed, and the safety production supervision and management department will impose a fine of more than 60% 100% of the previous year's income; Detain fugitives for less than fifteen days; If the case constitutes a crime, criminal responsibility shall be investigated in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law.

The main person in charge of the production and business operation entity shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph if he conceals, misrepresents or delays in reporting the production safety accidents.

The zoo where the leopard fled this time is Hangzhou Wildlife Park, and the main company behind it is Hangzhou Wildlife Park Co., Ltd. ... This zoo applied for the method of "scraping the rhinoceros horn device".

Who is in charge of the animals in the zoo? This must be the responsibility of the zoo, and whoever raises it is responsible. What should I do if something goes wrong, such as animals in the zoo hurting people? It depends on whether the zoo has fulfilled its duty of care. For example, there is a big iron net around the tiger park, and there are warnings such as no feeding, no touching and no entry. Next to it, a breeder shouted, just look, not touch.

But Zhang San didn't listen, so he had to learn from Song Wu to ride a tiger and take pictures. If the tiger didn't cooperate, he hammered it and was killed by the tiger. In this case, the zoo has clearly stipulated that it is not allowed to approach, and the breeder does not encourage it to contact. Zhang San is indefensible, and the zoo can choose not to pay or only pay the pension.

Because the zoo has fulfilled its management responsibility, it is not the zoo's fault that Zhang San died, so nothing happened. However, if there is no warning in the zoo, the breeder rides a tiger and says to Zhang San, do you want to try? The tiger was obedient and funny, and then the tiger knocked Zhang San to the ground with a sliding shovel. At this time, the zoo must take full responsibility.

Crime of endangering public security Three leopards escaped, and this danger is the life safety of the masses. This leopard escaped from the zoo for work, which brought public harm to our society. Therefore, this behavior may also be suspected of endangering public safety. Especially the crime of endangering public security is also a negligent crime. The leopard's escape was caused by the fact that the keeper of Hangzhou Wildlife Park did not strictly follow the operating rules when changing shifts. Therefore, the zoo may be a negligent crime in this respect.