Some companies are losing money every year. Why should they continue to operate?

The losses of state-owned enterprises can be roughly divided into two categories, one is the losses caused by poor management. The other is the loss caused by taking on too many social interests. After all, in addition to making profits, state-owned enterprises have to bear many social responsibilities. This question has ulterior motives. Now people's eyes are sharp, so you can't move the wind. Most state-owned enterprises are industries involving people's livelihood and national security, and assume more social responsibilities. This question is for nothing! ! State-owned enterprises assume more social responsibilities, such as full coverage of railway power grid communication. Will private companies do this? It is an indisputable fact that the mortality rate of private enterprises is much higher than that of state-owned enterprises, and the average life expectancy is only three to five years. Not many state-owned enterprises can stand for a long time.

For state-owned enterprises and private enterprises of the same scale, state-owned enterprises pay taxes of 654.38+0 billion, while private enterprises pay taxes of 50 million. This is the difference! If private enterprises want more space, they will sacrifice the interests of state-owned enterprises. In addition, state-owned enterprises generally adopt private management methods, and several people have the final say, losing effective control and supervision.

Most of the profits of private enterprises? This is a cognitive deviation, which fails to recognize the development law of market economy, that is, the weak are eliminated and the strong survive. Unprofitable means extinction. A little trouble will attract a lot of people's attention. Even if this state-owned enterprise really goes bankrupt, the government will try its best to prevent these workers from really eating. Private enterprises are completely different. If they go bankrupt, they will go bankrupt. People who work are like fallen leaves in autumn. If they lose their jobs, they will lose their jobs.

The loss of state-owned enterprises is the loss of the country, and it can also fatten the boss. All the profits of private enterprises went to the boss, desperately trying to do well.

ZTE is not as good as Huawei, Xugong Zhonglian is not as good as Sany, and the same type of state-owned enterprises are not as good as private enterprises. Why do many state-owned enterprises fail at a loss? This statement has been circulated in the society in the past, but I wonder if it is appropriate to use it here. There are rich abbots in poor temples! You know nothing about enterprises. When it comes to losses and bankruptcies, private enterprises are 50 times more than state-owned enterprises. The reason for the collapse of state-owned enterprises is not poor management, but because of the backward and eliminated parts or links in the industrial structure.