The theoretical basis of Chinese medicine seems to be not very scientific, so why keep Chinese medicine?

Chinese medicine generally refers to the traditional medicine created by the working people of Han nationality in China, so it is also called Chinese medicine. It is a subject that studies human physiology, pathology, disease diagnosis and prevention. Chinese medicine was born in primitive society, and the theory of Chinese medicine was basically formed in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, and was summarized and developed in past dynasties. In addition, it has a far-reaching influence on the countries in the cultural circle of Chinese characters, such as Japanese traditional Chinese medicine, Korean medicine, Korean medicine and Vietnamese oriental medicine, all of which are developed on the basis of Chinese medicine. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) bears the ancient people's struggle against diseases in China.

Our experience and theoretical knowledge is a medical theoretical system gradually formed and developed through long-term medical practice under the guidance of ancient naive materialism and spontaneous dialectical thinking. Based on the theory of yin-yang and five elements, Chinese medicine regards the human body as the unity of qi, form and spirit. Through the method of "seeing, hearing and asking", it explores the cause, nature and location of the disease, analyzes the changes of pathogenesis of viscera, meridians, joints, qi and blood and body fluid, judges the rise and fall of evil, and then obtains the name of the disease, summarizes the syndrome types, and formulates the principle of "sweating and body fluid" on the basis of syndrome differentiation and treatment.

Western medicine is the same, I believe that people who see this place should not.

Do you doubt that "the human body is not actually made up of cells" and "there are no bacteria and viruses in the world"?

. There is no need to argue about "proven science" such as biology, microbiology, physiology and anatomy. As early as its birth, countless scientists have studied it. The basic theory of western medicine is correct and scientific, and I don't think it is necessary to argue. It can be argued that "even with scientific theory, is the treatment method of western medicine reasonable and feasible?" The pharmaceutical method of western medicine is to guide drug synthesis by theory. The synthetic drugs have been tested by action experiments and animal experiments to verify their efficacy and toxicology. The clinical experiments are solid, and the application is on the market, and the treatment feedback is tracked. Western medicine has been controlled by theory. The means of traditional Chinese medicine is to use natural ingredients, such as natural herbs, animal and plant ingredients (animal bones, insect skins, etc. ) and natural minerals, and use a lot of experience to "attribute", obtain pharmacology from facts and practice, and refine theory. Of course we have to keep it. This was left by our ancestors.