Why were there so many homosexuals in ancient times? It seems that no one rejected homosexuality at that time, but now it is rejected by most people.

In ancient times, people thought that the purpose of marriage, or sexual relations, was to have children, that is, to carry on the family line. This is based on the ancient understanding of filial piety. So for men, as long as you finish this task, you will be "free". This is why the ancients had three wives and four concubines, and their views on homosexuality were based on this. As long as a man has an heir, his future love life and sex life will be arbitrary. It's just a pastime anyway. Even if you are gay, teasing you won't be very exclusive at best. This view, coupled with the fact that homosexuals in ancient times were mostly rich and powerful officials or literati, they were privileged or even ruling classes, and they liked it. Naturally, no one came out to object excessively (the ancient people were too poor to make a living, so they had no leisure). Lesbians in ancient patriarchal society. Women are tools for housekeeping and raising children, and your purpose is to serve men and have children, and to continue the incense for men. Obviously, the homosexual relationship between women can neither serve men nor continue the blood for men. Then you are a lesbian. In ancient times, you were naturally considered useless and even considered a demon.

In modern times, the views of feudal times are more exclusive. After monogamy, you can't have second thoughts about others when you get married. Everyone thinks that falling in love with the opposite sex you like is a proper process of life, but how can you like the same sex? What's more, it's disgusting and not "normal" at all. What's more, this is a bad habit of the ancient elite, and of course modern people should oppose it. In addition, the current grassroots homosexuality makes traditional culture.

What I said above is China, which is different abroad. In the west under the guidance of Christianity, marriage was also emphasized in ancient times, or the purpose of sexual relations was to have children. The difference is that the purpose is not to carry on the family line, but the task that God wants you to complete. In other words, you can only treat feelings, marriage and sex with the concept of fertility, but not entertainment, so in the Middle Ages, abstinence was serious. Don't even think about homosexuality. In addition, homosexuality is explicitly prohibited in the Bible (I can't remember the specific chapters and words), which means that homosexuality is not only impossible, but also sinful. Therefore, in ancient western countries, homosexuality was not only excluded, but also found to be put to death. Women are even worse. Originally, when the plague prevailed in the Middle Ages and people's physiology was backward, women were generally regarded as the embodiment of impurity and witches, even if women walked closer.

In the modern west, things are different. In western capitalist countries, homosexuals are bold because they advocate sexual liberation and human rights and freedom. They feel that no matter what their sexual orientation is, it is their own business and has nothing to do with others. Coupled with the tolerant attitude in western thinking (isn't there a saying that "I don't agree with your point of view, but I will defend your rights to the death"?

Hehe ~ ~ ~ I am bisexual myself, and the above are all the analysis in a very comprehensive book about homosexuality that I saw in the library. I don't know if it will help and understand your problem.