The reasons why network development does more harm than good to literature.

As one of the greatest scientific inventions in 2 1 century, computers and networks have a profound impact on all aspects of human social life. Undoubtedly, with the development of the Internet, they will have an increasingly important impact on our lives.

As a part of social ideology, literature is inevitably influenced by the Internet, and the more the Internet develops, the greater the influence on literature.

This kind of influence has both advantages and disadvantages-whether it is beneficial or harmful can only be seen through comprehensive comparison.

On the positive side, the network has narrowed the distance between us and literature-as long as we open the network, we can easily read and download a large number of literary works in it; As long as we are willing, anyone can write something in this virtual space and let go of their literary dreams. I even want to applaud the benefits that the internet has brought to literature. However, the disadvantages brought by the development of the network really make me seriously say, "The development of the network does more harm than good to literature!"

First of all, due to the zero starting point of the network, there are a lot of shoddy and moaning works, which will inevitably affect the purity of literature, reduce readers' reading taste and interest, and play a role in curbing the prosperity of literature.

Secondly, due to the convenience of the development of the Internet, writers rarely choose words carefully and weigh them repeatedly in the process of creation, but pursue the high efficiency and free play of creation, and their attitude towards writing is not as rigorous as before, even full of many online languages, which will also dilute the light of literature.

In addition, due to the development of the Internet, the copyright of creators is not well protected, and the original works are reproduced or even dismembered casually, which has no minimum respect for the creators' labor, which in turn will affect the creators' enthusiasm and greatly reduce the motivation of literary creation.

Through the above analysis, it is easy to draw a conclusion; The development of network does more harm than good to literature!

For the development of literature, we must avoid impetuousness and quick success, but the network often provides a hotbed for this impetuousness.