Why is it forbidden to burn biological particles in urban no-burn zones?

It is mainly because the national level has defined the "two alternatives" of biomass briquette replacing coal and biomass briquette replacing coal for heating, which has accelerated the rapid development of biomass briquette industry, but local governments at all levels are indifferent.

When formulating environmental protection policies, biomass solid briquettes are classified as three types of fuels, which are strictly controlled or simply not supported or opposed. If we want to change coal burning to burning biomass particles, we will only treat it coldly, and we will not say no to the approval, which will lead people to "is the country forbidden to burn biomass particles, and is it allowed to burn biomass particles for environmental protection?" problem

Biomass granular fuel

Biomass pellet fuel is environmentally friendly and its cost is lower than that of gas.

Shi Yuanchun, pioneer of biomass industry and academician of the two academies, once said that biomass briquette is a clean, green and low-carbon renewable and environmentally-friendly new energy. When biomass briquette is burned in a biomass boiler, it can meet the smoke emission standard of natural gas only by simple dust removal, and the smoke and nitrogen oxides discharged meet the national emission standard, and the value of sulfur dioxide discharged is much lower than that of gas. ?

In terms of cost, the cost of peanut shell briquette is lower than that of coal, and the cost of biomass pellet fuel is equivalent to that of coal. Most importantly, the cost of biomass fuel is only half that of gas. From the perspective of cost and environmental protection, biomass fuel is no problem. Biomass fuel uses agricultural and forestry wastes and turns waste into treasure. Why not?