Try to compare the theoretical characteristics of three different sociological traditions.

The corresponding theories are critical sociology with class perspective as the background, explanatory sociology with (social) action and value as the orientation, and empirical sociology based on the whole society (that is, taking society as an entity and organism and taking social facts as the research object) (the so-called empirical sociology is not a narrow data analysis, but a causal explanation of rules and mechanisms). Of course, Durkheim's early and middle-late thoughts have changed, and he tends to establish the disciplinary status of sociology at an early stage. The so-called meta-theory refers to the premise that the theory is self-evident.

It's strange to come uninvited. No one knows how to answer.

First of all, the three theories you mentioned should refer to the three theoretical directions of the three giants of classical sociology. The Big Three refers to Marx, Weber and Emile Durkheim. The corresponding theories are critical sociology with class perspective as the background, explanatory sociology with (social) action and value as the orientation, and empirical sociology based on the whole society (that is, taking society as an entity and organism and taking social facts as the research object) (the so-called empirical sociology is not a narrow data analysis, but a causal explanation of rules and mechanisms). Of course, Durkheim's early and middle-late thoughts have changed, and he tends to establish the disciplinary status of sociology at an early stage. The so-called meta-theory refers to the premise-related problems that the theory is self-evident.

The above is the explanation of what you said.

Then there is the actual exercise (it should be noted that the relationship between theory and reality is not direct, and the following examples are just to illustrate the ideas of the three theories).

Before that, anyone who talks about sociology should understand that whether it is macro sociology or micro sociology, sociology is not about closed individual psychological behavior, but about people's actions in relationships.

Such as conflicts and contradictions between enterprises and employees.

Marx may say that this is an irreconcilable contradiction between classes and a struggle between capital and labor.

Weber may say that the factors that affect the struggle may be the interaction of three "ideal types" of power, capital and prestige, and the contradiction comes from people's pursuit of these three values.

Durkheim said that this may be because the company or employees did not follow the established group rules, and the conflict may come from "anomie" (that is, the guidance of the rules is lost or the rules no longer work).