Short video is always infringing, how to do it without infringement? Why infringement?

Short video is always infringing, how to do it without infringement? Why infringement? It is very basic that a video cannot have a watermark. The platform is unacceptable. Watermark must be deleted when editing. If you can't use it directly, you can turn it into an explanation video and a good movie recommendation video, cut off the trivial plot between the movie and the TV material, reassemble the wonderful parts and add some sound effects. Dubbing is basically your original work. It is often said on the internet that film and television editing is not good. In fact, they can't be purely for transportation. Explanations and suggestions are still very interesting. In addition to material copyright, we should also attach importance to the copyright of music. Some music can't be directly used as background music. There are copyright restrictions. You can check it here before using it. You can also directly use the music in the platform as the background music, so there will be no copyright problem.

A group of self-media bloggers have attracted a large number of fans and even conducted commercial operations by sorting out and interpreting the materials of film and television dramas. However, with the improvement of copyright awareness of the whole society in recent years, the practice of editing videos and screenshots that these blogs and platforms used to rely on is also facing the risk of infringement. Gu Amo was collectively sued for alleged copyright infringement, involving a trip to Busan, Zootopia, Korean drama w-two World and other 13 film and television works. When Gu Amo negotiated with the five major companies in Taipei, the first "graphic film" case in Chinese mainland was declared. An online graphic film interpretation software with the slogan "Taste a good movie in ten minutes" was caught in a copyright dispute because it used 382 screenshots of the TV series "to the sky kingdom". Recently, Beijing Internet Court sentenced the first case of "graphic film" in China.

Then, from the legal point of view, how to determine whether dividing film and television dramas into pictures or short film reviews constitutes infringement? It is undeniable that such movie clips are often original. So most of these works can also constitute works protected by copyright law. However, originality is only one of the conditions for the achievement to constitute a work, not a criterion for judging whether the achievement is infringing. Without the authorization of the copyright owner, whether it is used reasonably is the key factor to judge whether it constitutes infringement.