Is it better for children to learn archery to practice competitive anti-curve or traditional practice?

Kid! Everything is the same. The game is a quasi-shooting. In traditional England, it is a long bow, but in China, it is an anti-bow. Only hunting bows can have straight bows, and sports competitions are generally aimed at shooting accurately. As for hobbies, I can't say that I can play rapid fire, but accuracy and speed coexist. Among all the types of retroflexion, only the traditional retroflexion in ancient China is the best, with excellent production, high accuracy, relatively high range and firing rate. The arrow uses the traditional reflexive method in China. Field tests show that the strength and accuracy of English longbow and Japanese bow are not as good as those of traditional bows in China. Only the compound pulley bow is the most powerful, but it belongs to the modern bow. In fact, according to the craft, the traditional bow in China is also a kind of compound bow, because the bow pieces are all treated as compound bows.