Planning scheme of finished product new warehouse

Warehouse planning and design is divided into eight steps: first, the preparation for the start of the project; Second, data processing and analysis; Third, discuss the goals of future strategy; Fourth, system requirements analysis; Fifth, planning and design; Sixth, the evaluation and selection of the scheme; Seventh, fine step design; Eighth, the implementation of the plan.

In the actual operation process, some people often skip the second step, or do the third step before the second step, which is often divorced from the status quo and has nothing to do with the status quo, resulting in the data calculated in the later design is very easy to handle. Put some equipment, such as picking each equipment with radio frequency. Everyone can pick as many as they want every hour, but is it suitable for them? It can be said that it is suitable for you, but it is also suitable for any enterprise.

After the third step, some people may come back to do some data collection and analysis, and often talk about EIQ before doing it. EIQ can only say a general method and idea, which is often useful in operation, but it can't completely help you deal with these data. How to understand EIQ? Average daily order quantity, value of order quantity or daily purchase quantity, etc. Then there is the correlation between the order and the product, but for other things, such as the seasonality of this product, its changing trend. Waiting for this piece of stuff may not help you to do this piece of analysis. Besides, when analyzing the data, my personal opinion depends more on the idea of the data analyst, and his idea will directly determine the value of the analysis.

Some people do it simply, and the value of data analysis is limited. For every warehouse manager, it is clear what kind of quantity it is. Although there are no exact figures, the estimated figures are not much different. However, when planning the warehouse, only these figures are evaluated. I think it's no different from the original warehouse, but it's enlarged a little. The original may only accommodate 1000 pallets, but it may be expanded to accommodate 5000 pallets in the future, that's all.

Another problem-prone place is the fifth step. After getting a data, how to operate this data depends on the ability of the planner. At this point, everyone's ideas will be very, very different. In the future, when meeting your needs, it may be, for example, very automated, and then what kind of trends will be designed, or how to operate through this other mode, and so on. Under this limited automation, can we achieve a better, more efficient and more satisfactory solution? This is the designer's problem. The basic problem may be in these two places.

When doing data analysis in the second step, how to operate its data analysis method? The first one includes its training, what data this person needs, and then these data may represent some meaning. Often people who analyze data don't know how to operate on the spot, so they take something and run. He doesn't know what the basic thing is, and the main result may be quite different from the actual work. But there is often a problem that people don't know what the scene is like, so we should pay attention to this training, including data collection, and then filter it. The raw data we get are often typed from the system, but which of these data is true and effective and which is false, these are all to be considered.

The third step is to discuss the future strategy. For example, your production scale has changed from 2 billion yuan to10 billion yuan. What is the trend of this change? For example, in the past, the average output was so much, but the peak value will suddenly be very high at some time in the future, and this phenomenon will occur, but it is often the most unpredictable time in the future. Without this idea, including the phenomenon at other times, the inventory turnover days may be 80 days now, 20 days in the future, etc., but how to get to 20 days, how to change, and in that direction. This piece is worth considering.

Of course, this step should be as detailed as possible, including the changes between SKUs, which products will sell well in the future and which products will go downhill in the future. One hundred products may be packed in one bottle, and may be packed in one bottle in the future. My understanding of these changes is that neither the people above nor the people below know, so I think it is more troublesome at present. I haven't seen anyone talk about these things, they often only know what it is like now. Maybe many people don't know what it's like now.

The fourth step is the demand analysis of the system. What is the trend of daily change? This piece is basically based on the current situation analysis and will be adjusted according to the future. Its practice is often that after I get a model of the present situation, I will get a model of the future through the superposition of the present situation and the future. It may be 2 billion now, and the daily shipment, how much capacity each region has, and how much cargo it handles will be 654.38+000 billion.

Flow balance chart/

Logistics balance diagram is very important for warehouse design, which directly determines the scale of warehouse design. I've never seen anyone make this thing. The front represents the purchase quantity. Maybe it has some special products, including big ones and other small things, or dig out every piece according to the characteristics of the products. This picture is about household appliances, and this one is a small household appliance, because the characteristics of each block are different after being divided according to SKU. In addition, the small ones may be placed directly on the small shelf or something, which will be delivered quickly. According to its process, we can get such a data. Generally speaking, this picture is here, and the rightmost one is outside, so it is necessary to balance in and out, how much goes in on the left and how much goes out on the right, which may be based on the data of this cycle or the data of one year. Within a year, the left goods and the right goods are exactly the same, and the quantity is the same. Why are they the same? If they are not equal, there will often be two results, one may be out of stock, the other may be endless goods, and the endless goods cannot be accommodated in the warehouse.

After buying goods here, you can directly get the scale of the platform, including how the traffic is. This is the control of the platform, and the difference of each purchase quantity is adjusted. There is a temporary storage area for the purchase volume, which depends on the efficiency of car insertion, and there may be temporary quality inspection, so the size of the temporary storage area depends on the characteristics of logistics, which ones need to be put on the shelves, which ones need special treatment, etc., and there may be returns, so the size of this area is obtained. After the return area comes, the size of this area, including pallet stacking, shelves, etc., is followed by the delivery area, here is the sorting and conformity area, and the size of the packaging area. Through my work efficiency, I can get how much this piece needs. Finally, there will be a staging area for shipment, and the size of the staging area directly determines its size. Then there will be a platform, and the daily order volume directly determines how many cars are sent every day, and then determines the number of distribution platforms. This is the meaning of the whole flow balance table.

Through this balance sheet, we have come to a conclusion after defining and analyzing all the problems in the previous period. This result directly determines the layout of the future warehouse, including the size and so on, all the meaning and everything. So we call these things the master plan of warehouse design. But many people don't do it at present. This will affect the analysis results, and then directly affect the efficiency of regional size and other issues.

Logistics planning and design,

Logistics planning and design, because the previous flow balance table already knows the size and efficiency of each area in the warehouse, but that is to say, there is already this area. Where is this area in the warehouse? If you don't do this, this is called systematic design. If you don't do this, then I can put this in any area, such as how to arrange this between the shipping temporary storage area and the storage area, including the distance between the two platforms.

But if I don't make this piece, I don't know the relationship between storage and storage area, so it's difficult to decide what position and size this piece is. In addition, if I can't decide this piece, I will leave it casually, and the distance between warehouses will be far away, which will affect the efficiency of travel. If the warehouse is large, it may take hundreds of meters to run once. If there are ten singles, run ten times, which is one kilometer. That man will be exhausted, and no one wants to do it.

Judging from my senior experience, I think few people count this thing, and more rely on their own experience to estimate it. As the statement above shows, the stock is here. After the inventory is completed, you must go to the temporary storage area, which is next to the inventory entrance. After passing the temporary storage area, it went up and down. Up and down will make up to the right, make up to the right, and then sort. This often happens, but is it the best? Many people do this, so this piece is very valuable, so what should this piece look like and what is the relationship between the pieces? This picture has a red line and a blue line. The thicker the line, the closer it is. If it's okay, it means that the relationship is very loose and you can put it around, but now no one often does this kind of thing. Basically, I I think this piece is very, very necessary.

Put forward a logistics plan

When I put forward the logistics plan, after I get that thing, I can draw this picture, where each area of this warehouse is, and then what it is like. After drawing a picture, I may give a different plan. The common problem is that after drawing this picture, I will skip the next step and judge directly according to experience, and get this picture, because the previous area is already there, and the size of each area is directly displayed on the picture.

The difference between several different schemes, some people change direction, the layout in the warehouse changes direction, and then they say that they have made a new scheme. I admire the courage of these people now, so they can all do it. The next step is detailed planning, what each place is like, and data analysis is needed to get the result.

After doing this, the following is very easy, as long as you pay more attention to the details. From the definition analysis of the problem, the definition analysis includes on-site diagnosis, where the bottleneck is, basically depending on the bottleneck problem, solving the bottleneck, and then including other things, and then getting a strategic plan, with a priority problem, which may focus on solving the development problem of a certain region, and may consider the development of the whole group company, or other things.

What is the goal of full warehouse implementation? What should I build this warehouse? After the overall guiding ideology comes out, I need to do data mining and analysis, and then the results of data analysis and mining are directly fed back to two aspects. One is the operation strategy, what is the strategy of each block, is it possible to optimize a block, is it possible to say, how to say this, how to describe it, whether this order is unpacking sorting or different strategies, such as combining multiple orders and sorting at the same time. This strategy can be obtained through data analysis. In addition, the analysis of each area, how big is the area, and what is the relationship between them? After getting these two analyses, the following words may do such a simulated action. In fact, on the surface, it seems so. What can I say? Rich people can do it. People who spend money don't do it. Finally, they get a list of what equipment the warehouse needs, what the information system is like, what the process is like, and what the pictures are like. They basically get these four items, and then they can start working. Hercules warehouse planning and design team answers!