Traditional Culture Encyclopedia - Traditional culture - Guangwei is about 6.3M 200, which pole is light and hard?
Guangwei is about 6.3M 200, which pole is light and hard?
Lighter, like the thin hard peak of Guangwei, the measured weight of 6.3m is190g, which is more than 200g. It is said to be 28 tones. Personally, I feel a little partial to 37, and the price is still in line with the requirements, less than 300.
I don't know why the landlord likes to choose Guangwei. If lightweight is required, Guangwei is obviously not dominant. The same price, such as Farah's Crossing the Rainbow, measured 2 16 grams at 6.3 meters, and the price was less than 200. At night, it is 6.3 meters and 200 grams, and the price is less than 200, which is also a relatively hard pole.
Of course, we can't blindly pursue lightweight and hardness. The firmness should also be considered, such as Yufeng's pole, which is very light and hard, but many customers react that the pole body is fragile.
If the weight requirement is low, Li Guang of Guangwei (6.3 m 330g, 28-tone, price below 200) and Tian Lei of France (6.3 m 330g, 28- 19 tone, price above 200) are both soft and hard. The only drawback is the weight. Comparatively speaking, Tian Lei has a better hand feeling, with a relatively backward center of gravity and no obvious sense of falling.
- Previous article:Where is the address of Jinyang, the city that never sleeps in Chengdu?
- Next article:What was the ancient school uniform called
- Related articles
- Characteristics of the Development of Mathematics Curriculum in Traditional Primary Schools in China
- Traditional festival stories about bears.
- Is Huo Zhinan's calligraphy collectible?
- Classification and efficacy of ginseng
- What fishing rod is of good quality, light and cheap?
- How to draw a foreign old-fashioned house
- How to make soy sauce at home?
- What are the specialties of Maoming?
- What kinds of surfactants are there? What are the main functions and uses of various surfactants in cosmetics?
- Why is industrial vision inspection more advantageous than artificial vision inspection?