Should Starbucks move out of the Forbidden City?

We're just having fun. I'm sure that we shouldn't. Reason: 1. The other party said that Starbucks should move out, just because in everyone's opinion, Starbucks, a western thing, has eroded the Forbidden City, which best represents China culture. However, Starbucks in the Forbidden City has been integrated with the architecture of the Forbidden City in appearance, and even the signboard has been removed. People who don't know have no idea that this is Starbucks. The reason why China's culture is profound is that it absorbs many foreign things, integrates them, and makes it something with China characteristics. A large part of tourists visiting the Forbidden City are foreign tourists. They have a demand for coffee, and Starbucks can meet their demand. Maybe the other person will say, you can drink something else, you don't have to drink coffee. But why do some people insist on drinking something they are not used to? ! Coca-Cola and Kodak can be seen everywhere in the Forbidden City. Why didn't anyone ask them to move out? In this regard, the other party may say: Coca-Cola, Kodak, etc. They didn't appear as monopoly brands in the Forbidden City. But don't things that can be seen everywhere in the Forbidden City affect others' impressions of the Forbidden City more than a facade? ! When people drive Starbucks into the Forbidden City, they say that they have eroded our culture. Excuse me, if our Yonghe soybean milk machine enters the White House, will we be ashamed or proud? !