The Debate between Innovation and Tradition

I believe that China (China has a civilization of 5,000 years) is the most commonly used positive example, while the United States (the United States has less than 300 years) may be used negatively.

First of all, we can take China as an example to demonstrate that "a long history is the driving force of cultural innovation". There are many examples, such as the emergence of Confucianism and Taoism, and the evolution of Buddhism in China. For example, the development and cultural innovation in the 30 years of reform and opening up. I can receive many examples, especially the splendid culture of China during the Republic of China, and I want to mention it in particular.

Second, pay special attention to the development of American culture, because this may be the focus of your counterattack. Although the United States has a history of less than 300 years, its land has produced an unprecedented splendid culture. Can we say that a long history is not the driving force of cultural innovation? Of course not. Because American cultural innovation is still based on a long initial cultural history, including European civilization, American civilization, Eastern civilization and so on. This further illustrates your argument. For example, the success of Kung Fu Panda is rooted in the traditional culture of China. If you have any questions, continue to discuss.