Is it better to learn Taekwondo or Sanda? Which is easier to get started? Which is more tiring to learn?

Of course, Sanda is more powerful, but it is also relative. If you want to learn Taekwondo for N years more than those who just learned Sanda, I can't do Sanda with more lethality. I'm tired of training. Taekwondo looks good, but it's good to learn it well!

Sanda is more practical, if it is used for self-defense, so the armed police practice Sanda, not Taekwondo.

Taekwondo is more ornamental and less practical than Sanda.

The requirements for learning are different. Sanda needs strength and skill to defuse opponents' attacks, with the aim of knocking them down.

Taekwondo needs correct footwork, which means appreciation. From the perspective of international competition, the purpose of Taekwondo is to strike opponents, not to knock them down.

If you learn to play ball, you can learn Taekwondo. If you defend yourself or intend to do justice, you can learn Sanda.

It is Sanda in China that can improve the actual combat level in a short time. It is easy to learn, comprehensive in technology and closely related to traditional Wushu. Moreover, there are not too many requirements for martial arts foundation, which is suitable for young people to speed up in a short time.

Who's afraid of who? It is dedicated, and plagiarism will be investigated.