What are the characteristics and requirements of the language of literary criticism articles

The emphasis on historical consciousness and historical principles is one of the most striking dominant tendencies in new Chinese literary theory and criticism. This tendency has its origins in the great tradition of the Chinese nation's emphasis on history, and is also linked to the "highest standard" of literary criticism, which is based on the "aesthetic and historical viewpoints" of the classic Marxist writers. However, from the period of the Left League to the end of the Cultural Revolution, the historicist or holistic sociological approach became synonymous with the historical method. Although the literary circles of the new period emphasized the self-discipline of literature and still insisted on the historical method, they did not seem to have explored the meaning of the historical method more y, except for the requirement of placing literature under the perspective of history, so that the historical method only remained at the level of theoretical "nominalism," and it was difficult to implement it into concrete criticism. Therefore, it is still necessary to discuss the meaning of historical method. In fact, historical method is not the same thing as historicist or sociological method, and the historical consciousness in ancient China was not historicist or sociological.　　Literary criticism, as a practical and rational activity, is both a comprehensive operation of knowledge and full of the wisdom and insight of humanism and value beliefs. Discussing this issue, I choose two criticisms by Bakhtin, the greatest thinker and literary theorist of the twentieth century, as examples, and the effect may be more concrete.　　Of course, I am concerned with the logical starting point of his critical activity.