Is the mirror bigger and people look better?

Well, I found a more reliable statement:

-

When I come out, it's always dull, and my eyes are also dimly lit, but I have super big eyes and thick, long and upturned eyelashes, but I don't wear makeup at all.

The nose is straight, but not so three-dimensional. The mouth is neither too big nor too small, and the corners of the mouth are upturned. But I always feel horrible when I come out. The worst thing is round face, fleshy and a little oval. It comes in the form of pie. tableware ...

The following is my experience, written to all the students who are troubled by this problem like me:

A high-definition camera takes a real image of a person one meter away from the normal focal length.

It's true,

Therefore, students who see their photos need not doubt that the lens of the camera is hundreds of times more powerful than the human eye, which is not only "objective" but also very holistic, and its advantages and disadvantages are clearly displayed.

In contrast, the eyes are selective. First, the eyeball is a moving imager.

Moreover, everyone will observe with feelings and preferences. In some places, they will pay more attention, and in others, they will be swept away. For example, when they see beautiful eyes, they will ignore the defects on their faces, and healthy skin color will make up for the lack of five senses ~

It can be said that people are almost themselves in the mirror.

Unless you choose a particularly beautiful mirror and deceive yourself with some kind of light and posture expression every day,

Usually pay more attention to the mirror in the street or shop, change a few lights or angles to feel it in all directions, and that's how others feel about you.

But don't get too close to the mirror or look at yourself in the mirror from another angle. This is as distorted as a selfie.

In addition, the camera is a picky owner, and it also has its own preferences. Generally, the oval face is more photogenic than the oval face, and the sharp corners of the eyes are more photogenic than the rounded corners. No meat is more photogenic than meat.

Generally speaking, the lens prefers sharp, thin and thin things, because the photo itself is to flatten three-dimensional things and turn dynamic things into static ones, so it is absolutely right to choose people for the lens, but it will look good if it is "picked". Not necessarily, it can only be said that some people who have a special "lens advantage" have been singled out. If you put these advantages into your life, it will be a bit too much.

In this respect, the lens is also "distorted" relative to people's subjective feelings.

And when taking pictures, you can also use factors such as light and shadow, angle, posture and expression. This is different from the continuous and realistic images that your eyes see at various azimuth distances.

So, I believe people around you have told you that it is not beautiful, you don't have to dwell on photos, but you can use photos to find out where you need to improve.

To sum up, photos are objective, human eyes are subjective, and aesthetics is subjective, so the beauty felt by others is similar to that felt by yourself, provided that you are not too narcissistic (* _ *).

Photos can't fully show a person's style, but by improving photography skills, photos can be more beautiful. As for real life, students need not worry at all. Your beautiful place will still attract others' attention and ignore some of your shortcomings. Unpleasant places can be decorated with hair style and makeup, clothing posture, etc. Anyway, small shortcomings can fully achieve the effect of fostering strengths and avoiding weaknesses. I guess everyone around me has already mentioned it.