Which is easier: Analects, literary language, or Xiao Guwen?

The Analects of Confucius is a literary text, and there is no difference between Xiao Gu Wen and the literary text as opposed to the modern vernacular. Literally speaking, the literary language is the kind of language that is very taut. Ancient Chinese is the language and writing of ancient times. "Ancient" is also a vague concept, pre-Qin relative to the two Han, can be said to be "ancient"; Tang and Song relative to the Ming and Qing Dynasties, can also be called "ancient". The "literary language" is relative to the "vernacular language". The first "文" means written text. The first "文" means written text, and the second "言" means to write, express, or record. The first "wen" means written text, and the second "yin" means writing, expressing, recording, etc. The first "wen" means written text, and the second "yin" means writing, expressing, recording, etc. The first "wen" means written text, and the third "yin" means written text. also called "vernacular". The last one, "wen", means work, article, etc., and indicates the type of writing.

The Analects of Confucius is a collection of quotations compiled by the disciples of Confucius and his disciples during the Spring and Autumn period to record the words and deeds of Confucius and his disciples, and was written in the early Warring States period. The whole book **** 20 492 chapters, to discourse style, supplemented by narrative style, more concentrated embodiment of Confucius and Confucianism's political ideas, ethical thinking, moral concepts, principles of education, and so on.

Guwen (古文), from Shuowen (说文). It refers to an ancient style of writing, roughly generalized to the literary language. It is a collective term for the pre-54 literary language (generally excluding "ekphrasis"). In the Han Dynasty, the official script prevailed, so the pre-Qin script is called ancient Chinese, specifically referring to Xu Shen's "Shuowen Jiezi" in the ancient Chinese.