Is the debate between Jiang Kun and Guo Degang not just a comparison of vulgarity and elegance, or is it about the future of comedy?

The art form of comedy has been around for quite some time, and there have been ups and downs throughout the process. Guo's form of comedy is a bit of a departure from the traditional, so it's hard for many veteran artists to accept the situation.

Finally, Jiang Kun and Guo Degang in the field of comedy in the emergency caused a small sensation, but understand the content of the debate, and for the understanding of comedy will know , the two comedian artists of the debate is not in the simple vulgarity and elegance of the fight, but also for the future of the entire comedy of a debate, whether it can be in the follow-up to have a better development.

?

The traditional form of comedy

The heritage of comedy has been as long as 150 years, the existence of this form of initially in order to bring happiness to the audience, and in order to enrich the content, after the continuous development of the educational significance of the character, the contents of the baggage

The three elements of the existence of the comedy, the characters, the contents of the baggage. The existence of these three elements has gradually enriched the form of Xiangchang.

Jiang Kun through continuous efforts to make this form of non-legacy, obviously he is in order to let the art form of comedy to get better development, and ultimately bring more fun to the audience.

Jiang Kun's efforts to make this form of art a non-heritage one are clearly intended to bring more fun to the audience.

Jiang Kun's efforts to make this form of art a non-heritage one are clearly intended to bring more fun to the audience.

In the old artist's view, comedy should have educational significance, but the new comedy is more funny, so than purely educational comedy is more attractive to the audience, so that the form can be more long lasting.

Two, Jiang Kun and Guo Degang argument

Jiang Kun and Guo Degang although both for the field of comedy, but their perception of comedy is very different, which led to the controversy between the two appeared, but understand the matter of the people will know, between the two itself is no contradiction.

It is only because of the difference in their understanding of comedy that the so-called dispute arose.

The two men's argument has directly affected the entire field of comedy, and netizens have also given different views.

Even some viewers think that Jiang Kun has no new works, so he is not qualified to talk about the comedy, such a statement is too one-sided, for the two, although the argument, but the content of their argument is clearly for the comedy can be better development .

There is no such thing as a mainstream artist, but rather how to get more recognition for the art form of comedy, no such thing as elegance or vulgarity, just from their own point of view, discussing how to develop the future of comedy in a more permanent way.

How to develop a more promising future

This traditional art form, even if there is a great deal of educational significance, but strictly speaking in line with the audience's appreciation of the needs of the best development, it is clear that the Kuo Degang's comedy is quite popular.

And their comedy is not simply vulgar, there will be their own elegant place, depending on how the audience to understand. Jiang Kun's comedy is obviously more elegant, timely change can be more attention.