What is the saying that a father owes compensation to his son?

There is no direct legal basis for father's debt and son's compensation. There is no law that explicitly prohibits a father from paying debts to his son, and it is acceptable as long as the son is willing to pay them back. Of course, in law, personal responsibility is emphasized.

There is no direct legal basis for father's debt and son's compensation. This is a statement from Confucianism in China feudal society, and it is an interpretation and practice of filial piety. So now, it is also said in our country, and this custom is still in use. Then, there is no explicit prohibition in law on the practice of compensation for father's debts and son's compensation. As long as the son is willing to pay it back, it is acceptable. Of course, in law, personal responsibility is emphasized. The source of this theory mainly comes from the conclusion of reflection on the ancient "sitting system"-disaster is not as good as home. Therefore, although the father's debt and son's compensation have no legal basis, they can be used in our traditional customs in China. Legally speaking, it is good for both creditors and debtors.

Of course, if the son pays the debt for his father, then the debt disappears. In fact, the debt has not been completely cancelled, but has just been transferred. The father is still the debtor and the son is the creditor. As for whether there will be internal recovery between the two fathers and sons, it is hard to say. But generally not, unless the father did something unreasonable and illegal, and the son asked his father to pay back the money in order to stop his father's idea. This is actually necessary.

In fact, the law has such a provision, in the inheritance law. When the heir wants to inherit the decedent's estate, the inherited estate includes not only the amount of existing property, but also the amount of liabilities. So when his father died and his son inherited the inheritance, he paid back the money for his father. Of course, the repayment here is based on the father's inheritance, and inheritance is the limit. This is an indirect legal basis, but in fact we can see the shadow of personal responsibility.