Quxie has always advocated "cross talk innovation", is this view right? What do you think of this?

It's not that the Music Association has always advocated "crosstalk innovation", but that in today's great era, all crosstalk actors are innovating, and innovation is like sailing against the current and being ruthlessly eliminated by society. This is a realistic problem.

The so-called innovation of Quxie has always been an imitation of the past. They still hold the previous concept, maintain the biggest position of TV crosstalk, talk about educating people's crosstalk and enjoying the sunshine and rain of socialism. However, since the tea house crosstalk flourished and the Internet prevailed, it can be described as a combination of two swords, which suddenly broke the dream of TV crosstalk actors.

The officials of the Music Association also woke up from their dreams and started an ice-breaking journey. They think they are orthodox descendants of cross talk and representatives of elegant cross talk, so even innovation needs elegant innovation.

The most typical representative in this respect is Mr. Jiang Kun, who actually noticed this problem very early and has been seeking innovation and change. However, his emphasis is wrong and he always wants to innovate gracefully. He listened to a rap cross talk by Jiang Kun some time ago. Frankly speaking, I was shocked by the outside.

It is hard for the old man to watch Jiang Kun, who is nearly old, and several young crosstalk performers skipping and laughing on the stage. His old man's works are full of sound and taste, but they are really funny and have some flaws. There is no coke and no funny cross talk.

Crosstalk should be innovative. Lao Guo once said that what suits the ancestors of ordinary people cannot be changed. Only innovation and change under this big framework are fundamental. Perhaps Lao Guo's crosstalk theory is not suitable for everyone, but his point of view is not wrong. Lao Guo also compared the innovation of crosstalk to cooking. You can cultivate intensively, or you can add more skills and learn from other forms.

But you can't put the sputum bucket on the table. That's not innovation. That's nonsense. Ordinary people are not stupid, and the difference between good and bad is clear, so I advise all crosstalk performers who want to innovate, whether you are mainstream or non-mainstream, there is nothing wrong with wanting to innovate, but before innovating, master the tradition first, then think about other things, and don't treat their parents as fools.

Innovation brings life, workshops, construction sites, roads, companies and campuses ... Now some crosstalk groups are basically the content of the old society (with traditional signs). Their innovations are basically network languages. Their lives are airplanes, seat belts, flight attendants and noodles at the airport. ...

Their itinerary is tattoos, black shoes and hats, and a circle of bodyguards. You can't tell it's a literary and art worker. You can't see that the workers are happy. No wonder they are so afraid of innovation, because they really can't do it!